data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33843/33843ebbc7567c59d9f904ff17067a3efd3722ff" alt=""
Why do people buy special edition DVDs or Blu Rays? Let's see... vastly improved picture quality? Yup. Superior sound mixes that often utilize extra channels? Of course. More and better extras? That's often the main attraction! How about slim, space-saving packaging that looks cool on the book shelf? Well, maybe, but since I had a kid I'm all about saving space.
So what was the point of the Warner Bros/New Line 25th anniversary Blu Ray and DVD box set for Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles again? Yes, it's great that they included all three live-action films as well as the CGI cartoon from 2007. But the audio/video quality on the three live action films are barely an upgrade (especially on standard-definition). And the extras for the original live-action films are non-existent (the CGI Blu Ray is a duplicate of the feature-laden original release). The box advertises 'radical extras' like four turtle eye masks and tubular tattoos. Want to know what isn't advertised? Commentaries, deleted scenes, documentaries, or any other kind of bonus feature that fans might actually want from such a set. This makes me thank the heavens that the current Warner Home Video regime wasn't in place when those feature-packed Superman and Batman special editions were released back in 2005 and 2006.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e430/6e4309adfd82cefa3c5668e42613b5f871dc9c5e" alt=""
As for the movies, same as it was always. The first film is a stunningly good comic book adaptation, which is almost too faithful to the not-always kid-friendly source material. A friend of mine has often commented that he finds the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to be darker than Tim Burton's Batman, since this one is based in real-world New York City and not an art-deco, somewhat fairy-tale-ish Gotham City. I'm not sure I'd disagree with him, but regardless this remains a surprisingly potent action-adventure picture. Since many parents and critics were outraged by the grim tone and often brutal violence of the PG-rated original (there are five onscreen deaths, a supporting hero commits murder, and a teenager is beaten to death onscreen) the two sequels are more in line with the no-harm, no foul slapstick of the long-running animated series. The first sequel is silly, but bright, colorful fun with a terrific opening action scene. The third is just a dumbed-down bore. As for the CGI animated film, the less said about that one, the better (yawn is the word).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b0a/c2b0a40a1077a6d15641c12fbfa8422abaa3406d" alt=""
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - B+
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze - C+
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III: Turtles in Time - C-
TMNT - C-
Scott Mendelson
7 comments:
The animated TMNT film deserves way more credit than you're giving it. I also disagree that one of the heroes murders anyone in the first film. Even if the villain didn't return in part 2, killing in battle isn't the same as killing in cold blood.
You make some great points about packaging and extras though. It's a shame that after all these years, the deleted scenes from the first movie still aren't available.
I was referring to Casey Jones turning on the garbage crusher with Shredder still inside. Technically, legally, and (possibly) morally that's murder. It would be like knocking someone out and tying them to a tree, then shooting them in the head to make sure they didn't get up. I never had a problem with it, but said dark tone did cause concern with some parents and critics that summer.
Care to elaborate on said deleted scenes? I never heard about them. Thanks.
DVDs 1 and 4 don't have labels on them???
The fourth movie is easily as good as the first(if not better in some regards. Both deserve a B grade, no more no less.
If the action was a bit light, it was the best they could do with PG rating.
As for the deleted scenes from the first movie check here:
http://ninja-pizza.blogspot.com/search/label/tmnt-se
There was also a behind the scenes making of TMNT 2 somewhere and according to director Kevin Monroe, only a third of the deleted/alt scenes for TMNT 4 made it onto the DVD release, WB are just lazy.
The animated TMNT film deserves way more credit than you're giving it. I also disagree that one of the heroes murders anyone in the first film. Even if the villain didn't return in part 2, killing in battle isn't the same as killing in cold blood.
You make some great points about packaging and extras though. It's a shame that after all these years, the deleted scenes from the first movie still aren't available.
The fourth movie is easily as good as the first(if not better in some regards. Both deserve a B grade, no more no less.
If the action was a bit light, it was the best they could do with PG rating.
As for the deleted scenes from the first movie check here:
http://ninja-pizza.blogspot.com/search/label/tmnt-se
There was also a behind the scenes making of TMNT 2 somewhere and according to director Kevin Monroe, only a third of the deleted/alt scenes for TMNT 4 made it onto the DVD release, WB are just lazy.
I was referring to Casey Jones turning on the garbage crusher with Shredder still inside. Technically, legally, and (possibly) morally that's murder. It would be like knocking someone out and tying them to a tree, then shooting them in the head to make sure they didn't get up. I never had a problem with it, but said dark tone did cause concern with some parents and critics that summer.
Care to elaborate on said deleted scenes? I never heard about them. Thanks.
Post a Comment