data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2651a/2651a748229381f257b239a00226c7dfe48bff97" alt=""
Again, I waited till the final numbers were released because the estimates seemed somewhat off.
But, yes, it seems that Wall-E was downright front loaded, especially for an animated film. Ending the weekend with $63.1 million, it had a weekend multiplier of 2.7. To put it in more disturbing perspective, it opened with $3 million more on Friday than The Incredibles and Finding Nemo, yet those two pictures ended the weekend about $7 million ahead (both closed out with a touch over $70 million). Front loading? Less than stellar word of mouth? I don't know. The critics raved, but I have no idea how moviegoers in general will take to this downbeat and arty tone poem. Is it good? Yes, it's visually astonishing, and the ideas, while not totally original, are nourishing and worthwhile (it seems to mix elements of There Will Be Blood, Minority Report, and Idiocracy). I'd place it in the Million Dollar Baby category of great, flawed movies that I will probably never want to watch again.
.
.
MILD SPOILER - To answer the questions that have been buzzing - yes, it's about the environment, yes it's about Wal-Mart, and yes it's about obesity.
.
.
Make no mistake, this is a terrific three-day total for an artistically daring animated feature. Ratatouille did about 4x it's opening weekend by the end of its domestic run. Finding Nemo opened to $70 million and made it all the way to $339 million (4.84x its opening). The low mark is still The Incredibles, which did a 'mere' 3.7x it's $70 million opening (odd, since that is one of their very best pictures and it had one of the smallest second-weekend drops for a $50 million+ opening ever).
Anyway, if Wall-E plays like The Incredibles, it'll end up with $235 million. If it falls below even that to, for example, a mere 3.25x, it'll still end up matching the $204 million of Ratatouille. My own misgivings about its future aside, it'll have to crash and burn pretty hard to qualify as anything other than a solid financial hit. And, frankly, I expect the art house nature and vaguely anti-capitalistic leanings of the picture to be a big boon overseas (every right-wing article or pundit who calls Wall-E 'anti-American' sends another $10 into the overseas ticket coffers).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47566/4756679b8e6b600bd1634e45317a0c1653fce343" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3b6/ab3b6c6029ac259a265233a94d85bed42fcd437f" alt=""
Get Smart dropped 47% and ended day ten with a solid $77 million. Expect it to cross $100 million over the long holiday and end up a bit below $150 million. At $82 million, this was a solid investment for Warner.
In the 'glass is half full' column, M. Night Shyamalan's The Happening has now doubled its $60 million budget worldwide and will likely turn a tidy profit when all is said and done. In the 'glass half-empty column', of course, it's an allegedly terrible movie that has permanently scarred M. Night Shyamalan's once highly-touted artistic reputation. But, at least it'll make money, right?
In the 'glass is half full' column for The Love Guru... uh, I got nothing. It'll end out at $35 million on a $60 million budget. Good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92ab0/92ab0f846eeff5989312ea6cb8ad5f7b73321e66" alt=""
In the better news department, after hemorrhaging for the first two full weeks after its sensational opening day, Sex & The City finally stabilized with 45%-ish drops and it now has crossed the $140 million mark. Expect it to crawl to $150 million.
Next weekend we have the critically divisive Hancock and the expansion of Kitt Kitridge: An American Girl, which has been going gangbusters in very limited release for the last ten days.
Scott Mendelson
No comments:
Post a Comment