Duh. In fact, she'll probably make the wish-list as a token nod to gender-diversity, and all she had to do was become the first female in history to win a Best Director Oscar. I don't really have to explain this pick. She's been directing hard action pictures for thirty years. She's helmed the likes of Near Dark (a dusty vampire thriller that still holds up 25 years later), Point Break (which is really better than its camp-fueled reputation), the underrated Blue Steel, Strange Days, K19: The Widowmaker, the two-part guns-ablaze sixth-season finale of Homicide: Life on the Street, and of course the Oscar-winning The Hurt Locker. If Lionsgate wants instant critical respectability without breaking a sweat, Bigelow will be at the top of the list, regardless of gender.
North Country is the definition of the kind of movie that they just don't make anymore. As recently as 2005, Warner Bros. gave Ms. Caro the reins to an all-star drama detailing a landmark 1984 sexual-discrimination/harassment suit. Star Charlize Theron and supporting actress Frances McDormand both justifiably received Oscar nominations for the little-seen October 2005 release. The picture is a straight-up social issues drama, filled with character turns from Richard Jenkins, Sean Bean, Sissy Spacek, Woody Harrelson, and then-unknowns Amber Heard, Michelle Monaghan, and Jeremy Renner. In 2005, it was one of any number of big studio dramas battling it out for Oscar glory. Today, it would be a front-runner purely by virtue of its existence. Caro's picture personifies the sort of high-quality big-studio adult drama that is all-but an endangered species, and she also helmed the dynamite Whale Rider back in 2002 as well. If every studio release were at least as good as North Country, I imagine most of us wouldn't feel the need to constantly whine about the state of studio movies these days.
Catherine HardwickeYes, Red Riding Hood was an entertaining whiff. I like it even while admitting its pretty bad (it's certainly never boring and Gary Oldman is a hoot). But go back and watch the first Twilight. Here's a dirty secret: it's actually pretty good. It's light on its feet, quirky, self-depreciating, and utterly aware of its melodramatic nature. Unlike the self-serious sequels which treat their respective source material like holy tombs (and probably would have cut 'vampire baseball' out of fear of irreverence), the first Twilight is genuinely fun, willing to change little details and add character beats to keep the film engaging. Kristen Stewart is quite compelling as a more self-aware Bella while Robert Pattinson is allowed to be just a little goofy in the opening act (his biology-class freak out is pretty hilarious). Most importantly for the purposes of this current franchise, the supporting characters are wonderfully fleshed out and brought to life, giving the film a pulpy lived-in quality that none of the sequels can match (Bella's friends are actually charming and have their own lives). Point being, if you're among the many critics who wished that even a few of the supporting characters were a little more fleshed out in the first Hunger Games installment, why not bring on someone who knows how to build an aggressively lively supporting cast, even one that arguably super-ceded the stars for at least one film. She wouldn't be my top choice, but there would be some poetic justice to it nonetheless.
Has any movie made in the early 2000s, save perhaps Requiem For a Dream, aged as tragically-well as American Psycho? The film got mixed reviews in its day, with many critics unable to look past the grotesque subject matter (and the even more grotesque source material) to notice that the film's sex and violence were all-but beside the point. Christian Bale turns in what will probably be the best performance of his career (certainly Patrick Bateman is as defining a turn as Robert De Niro's Travis Bickle) in a brutal satire of the 1980s 'greed is good' corporate mind set that tragically proves even more topical today as the ghosts of Reagan came back to haunt us in the guise of George W. Bush and corporate giants like Goldman Sachs. Had the film been better received in its time, perhaps Harron wouldn't have just now helmed a theatrical follow-up, the upcoming The Moth Diaries (she directed an HBO Bettie Page biopic in 2005). Not to repeat a theme (and it won't be the last time I bring this up), but had 'she' been a 'he', Harron probably would have a half-dozen features to her name by this point.
She was supposed to be the mold-breaker. Hired late last year to helm Marvel Comics' Thor 2, Ms. Jenkins was supposed to become the first female director to direct a mega-budget comic book tentpole (Lexi Alexander's Punisher: War Zone cost just $30 million). But rather mysterious 'creative differences' excuse sent her packing, replaced by longtime television director Alan Taylor (director of the heartbreaking Homicide: Life on the Street series finale and the Mad Men pilot), which in turn led to a national grumbling among feminist film pundits and a very pissed-off Natalie Portman. Jenkins's career is a perfect demonstration of the gender-disparity in Hollywood. In an age where Marc Webb is handed the reins to The Amazing Spider-Man after directing one moderately successful low-budget romantic comedy (500 Days of Summer), Jenkins has barely worked since directing the Oscar-winning Monster nine years ago. She had recently won an Emmy for directing the pilot for AMC's The Killing, but that's pretty much all she has done since 2003. If you haven't seen Monster in awhile, it's a pretty great movie, and it's certainly more than just Charlize Theron's deservedly-Oscar winning star turn (Christina Ricci is just as good). Call it poetic justice or merely good sense, but Lionsgate would be wise to snap up Jenkins and give her the keys to an even bigger franchise.
In the late 1990s, Mimi Leder was on her way to becoming one of the biggest female directors in modern history. But while male directors get whiff after whiff until their eventual 'comeback film' (think Scorsese in the 1980s, from Raging Bull to Goodfellas), Leder was out after just one high-profile miss. Nevermind that The Peacemaker was a frighteningly ahead-of-its time action drama (and a painfully underrated one at that), nevermind that Deep Impact was at-the-time the highest-grossing film in history directed by a woman. The critical and artistic disaster of Pay It Forward pretty much killed everyone involved, ending the film careers of Helen Hunt and Haley Joel Osment while fatally damaging Kevin Spacey's prestige. Leder hasn't directed another theatrical feature since that 2000 disappointment (she helmed the 2009 Morgan Freeman/Antonio Bandaras direct-to-DVD action flick Thick As Thieves). She just started preproduction on a remake of All Quiet On the Western Front, which if it comes to pass will be her first theatrical release in twelve years. If you want a female director who knows how to craft top-notch action, why not hire Leder?
In a gender neutral world, Lynne Ramsay would be on all of the wish-lists right now. After all, she made a splash last year with the fantastic We Need to Talk About Kevin, coaxing a career-peak performance from Tilda Swinton and crafting a powerful psychological horror drama that defies easy description or even common interpretation. It's a powerful and gripping picture, her third feature no-less. If Chronicle's Josh Trank can end up with a dozen high-profile choices after making one terrific film, then Ramsay deserves her pick of the litter as well. Of course, the fact that Trank made his mark with a superhero deconstruction and was then offered a bunch of comic book superhero films is in itself a sign of Hollywood's lack of imagination, which is why Debra Granik (who would also be on various 'hot lists' in a just world) won't be on this list. There is no escaping the several similarities between Winter's Bone and The Hunger Games and I'd argue that choosing the helmer of the former is every bit as lazy as choosing Jennifer Lawrence to basically reprise her Oscar-nominated character in the first place. But Ramsay would be an inspired and outside the box choice, and arguably someone who can bring suspense and intensity to a franchise that lacked requisite tension the first time around.
With all the seemingly justified hub-bub about Brenda Chapman getting canned from Pixar's Brave last year, no one seemed to notice that Dreamworks (who hired Chapman to direct The Prince of Egypt fourteen years ago) gave one of their prize franchises to a South Korean female director who promptly knocked it out of the park. I assume you don't need me to remind you how much I loved Kung Fu Panda 2. It was my favorite film of 2011 and a splendid action dramedy that absolutely stands with Toy Story 2, The Dark Knight, and X2: X-Men United on the list of all-time great genre sequels from the last fifteen years. The only reason she isn't my top pick is because I wouldn't want her taking the Chasing Fire gig to stand in the way of her directing Kung Fu Panda 3. But she absolutely deserves a spot on every genre 'wish-list' from now until she retires.
And my personal pick...
Yes, it would be groundbreaking/cool/etc if the reins to today's biggest new franchise were handed off to an African-American woman. But it would also be just-plain-cool if Chasing Fire were handed to the person who happened to direct Eve's Bayou and Talk To Me. She directed three features between 1997 and 2007 (the middle one being the not-that great The Caveman's Valentine in 2001, which still featured a fine star turn from Samuel L. Jackson). But Eve's Bayou is a terrific period drama which features one of Jackson's best performances, period. Talk to Me is a fine and thoughtful biopic about 1960s Washington DC radio DJ Ralph "Petey" Greene (played by Don Cheadle) which features fine supporting work from Chiwetel Ejiofor (his pool-hall conversation with Cheadle is the stuff of acting-class gold), Taraji P. Henson and Martin Sheen (even if Sheen's best scene ended up on the DVD deleted scenes reel). I don't pretend to know why she has worked so little in the last fifteen years, but her lack of output has always (to me) personified the difficulty that minority and female filmmakers face in terms of having a steady output of films even after they've had one or two successes. Tokenism and/or Affirmative Action accusations aide, Lemmons has made two awfully good movies and deserves a shot a the big leagues at least as much as the likes of Josh Trank and Marc Webb.
Okay, your turn to pick. Who would you want to see helm the next Hunger Games film? It doesn't have to be a woman or a minority, but try to be a little creative.