Thursday, November 19, 2009

Ten years later, Fight Club is still better than American Beauty

Even ten years later, I remain puzzled and annoyed by the critical community's welcome embrace of American Beauty and shunning of Fight Club. They both deal with many of the same themes and cultural ideas. Yet American Beauty allows the flawed anti-hero to die a 'tragic' death and escape having to deal with the consequences of his actions (deleted scenes imply that he still goes to heaven). While the allegedly immoral and dangerous Fight Club ends with Tyler basically admitting he screwed up and taking a baby step to do better (of course, most Fincher films deal with characters finally accepting and welcoming personal responsibility for their poor life choices).

Scott Mendelson

And so it ends...

It's good to see the two key characters, Locke and Ben, finally taking center stage. Swoon all you want over Kate/Jack or Juliet/Sawyer, but the most interesting and entertaining relationship has always been between Terry O'Quinn and Michael Emerson (no wonder that they've both won Emmys). I still say that Ben Linus and John Locke need to be spun-off into their own sitcom. "Can two cryptic, fanatical would-be prophets escape from a cursed magical island and share a studio apartment together in the big-city without driving each other crazy? Find out this season as ABC presents Found, starting on Wednesdays after Modern Family." You all know you'd watch it.

The official Twilight Saga: New Moon weekend box office prediction.

Based on my top-secret, patented box office estimation formula, I hereby state that Twilight Saga: New Moon will gross $81 million over its first three days. No... wait, it will actually gross $91 million! It will definitely gross $81 million and/or $91 million! How do I know this? Simple. To quote everyone's favorite fictional Spanish teacher, played by Dr. Ken Jeong, I am a box office genius! If you recall, I did a comparison chart of every single franchise launched in the last ten years. I listed every single one unless I'm forgetting a franchise or two and how their sequels did over opening weekend compared to the initial entries. Go there. Checked it out yet?

Ok, welcome back. You'll notice that the biggest percentage jump for pure Fri-Sun stand-alone opening weekends for the first and second film in a franchise is the Harold and Kumar series. Harold and Kumar Goes To White Castle (the best comedy of the decade and one of the finest films made about race relations, but more on that next month) opened with just $5.4 million in its three-day opening weekend. It's terrible sequel, Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay opened to $14.9 million. That's a jump of 276% between films. On the other hand, the biggest decline in sequel opening weekends over the last ten years was suffered by Hostel 2. Hostel 2 opened to only $8.2 million, or just 42% of what the original Hostel opened with 18 months earlier ($19.5 million).

Ok, so using the awesome power of math (this is the part on Numbers where my floating head starts pointing at random variables and data points on a black screen), I took 2.76 and multiplied it by 0.42. That gives me approximately 1.16. So, it stands that the opening weekend for New Moon will surpass the opening weekend of Twilight by about 16%. OK, so 1.16 x $69.6 million = $81 million. Or, you can add up all the percentages of the pure Fri-Sun stand-alone weekend increases, which gets you 32.61. Divide that by the 25 films. That gets you 1.3044. Multiply that figure by 69.6 and you get a probable opening weekend gross of $91 million. So there you have it... Twilight Saga: New Moon will officially gross either $81 million or $91 million over its opening weekend. Read it and weep, Nielsen, CinemaScore, and/or Nikki Finke!

Scott Mendelson

Twilight may be 'doomed', but The Wrap didn't do their math.

Dominic Patten of The Wrap states six reasons why 'Twilight is doomed'. It's a lazy diatribe, which is irrelevant as three of the four films in the series have already been shot (ie - even if the series collapses, it's pretty much over anyway). And several of his 'reasons' don't square up. Bashing the directorial talents of Chris Weitz is pointless, since David Slade is the director behind the third film and the fourth film's helmer has yet to be decided (Pattinson wants Gus Van Sant, which seems like an oddly good fit since nothing much happens in his artier films either). I can't say I agree with Summit's choice to dump Catherine Hardewick (especially with the savage reviews that the new entry is receiving), but Summit clearly doesn't intend for this to be a single director's franchise. But the biggest problem is that Patten commits the usual 'I didn't do my homework' sin. In that, he deals with 'diminishing returns of sequels' by choosing franchises that disprove that very notion.

"In fact, “Harry Potter” has never pulled a bigger rabbit out of a hat than the almost $975 million the first 2001 film has made. The "Saw" flicks, which are up to "VI" with this year’s release, are cutting less box office cloth with each sequel. Despite his sterling reputation, “James Bond” doesn’t always shoot to kill at the box office and, as the shriveled sales of 2002’s “Episode II: Attack of the Clones” showed, the Force hasn’t always been strong with “Star Wars.”

Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones made $640 million worldwide on a $115 million budget. And Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith bounced right back, grossing $860 million, second in the franchise only to The Phantom Menace (not adjusted for inflation). And while no Harry Potter film has surpassed The Sorcerer's Stone ($974 million worldwide), each sequel has made $795-$938 million worldwide (with films 4-6 each increasing their gross over the previous entry). And despite mixed reviews, Quantum Of Solace just missed surpassing the worldwide record for a James Bond film. Besides, seven of the top eight biggest-grossing 007 films were the seven most recent ones.

And the article concludes by randomly bashing Michael Sheen, claiming that the third Underwold film's failure to surpass $100 million worldwide means that Sheen isn't useful as a tent-pole supporting player. Umm... two out of three Underworld pictures did not cross $100 million worldwide. Underworld made $95 million, Underworld: Evolution made $113 million, and Underworld: Rise of the Lycans made $91 million (without star Kate Beckinsale no less). Dominic Patten may be right about the Twilight series quick collapse (especially because even the many die-hards hate the fourth book), but the examples of sequel math don't equate. Again, ten minutes on Box Office Mojo would have yielded any number of better examples. Or he could have checked out my handiwork.

Scott Mendelson

Monday, November 16, 2009

The official Twilight Saga New Moon weekend box office comparison chart.

There will be no predictions, no guesses, and no analysis for the moment. We're just taking a second to do the cold math, using franchises that were created/rebooted in the last ten years. Basically, the list is "If New Moon performs like the opening weekend to sequel Y, then it will gross X over its opening weekend". The variable in play is the increase in opening weekend from the first film in the franchise to the sequel, multiplied by $69.6 million (Twilight's opening weekend) using only three-day Fri-Sun numbers. An asterisk (*) means that said movie opened on a non-weekend day (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday). Yes, I'm aware that comparing pure three-day openings to movies that opened over a longer weekend screws up the data (having four or five days to earn cash obviously spreads out the wealth more so than having three days), but this is not a science project. This is purely for enjoyment, and outliers are not meant to be taken as likely possibilities (never, ever use Shrek 2's five-day opening to compare anything). Enjoy. And yes, I will be recycling this chart when Iron Man 2 and the inevitable Star Trek 2 are released.


Every franchise that I can think of from 1999-2009.
The Matrix Reloaded
/The Matrix ($91.7m*/$27.7m*) 69.6 x 3.31 = $230 million.

The Dark Knight/Batman Begins
($158.4m/$48.7m*) 69.6 x 3.25 = $226 million.

Pirates... Caribbean 2/Pirates... Caribbean
($135.6m/$46.6m*) 69.5 x 2.91 = $202 million.

Harold & Kumar... Bay
/Harold& Kumar... White Castle ($14.9m/$5.4m) 69.6 x 2.76 = $192 million.

Shrek 2/Shrek
($108m*/$42.3m) 69.6 x 2.55 = $177 million.

American Pie 2
/American Pie ($45.1m/$18.7m) 69.6 x = 2.4 = $167 million.

The Ring Two
/The Ring
($35m/$15m) 69.6 x 2.3 = $162 million
The Bourne Supremacy/The Bourne Identity
($52.5m/$27.1m) 69.6 x 1.93 = $134 million.

A Night at the Museum 2
/A Night at the Museum ($54.1m/$30.4m) 69.6 x = 1.78 = $123 million.

Saw II
/Saw
($31.7m/$18.2m) 69.6 x 1.74 = $121 million.
Quantum Of Solace
/Casino Royale ($67.5m/$40.8m) 69.6x 1.65 = $115 million.

Final Destination 2
/Final Destination ($16m/$10m)
69.6 x 1.6 = $111 million.
X2: X-Men United
/X-Men ($85.5m/$54.4m) 69.6 x 1.57 = $109 million.

The Mummy Returns
/The Mummy ($68.1m/$43.3m) 69.6 x 1.57 = $109 million.

Transformers 2
/Transformers ($108.9m*/$70.5m*) 69.6 x 1.54 = $107 million.

Ice Age: The Meltdown
/Ice Age ($68m/$46.3m) 69.6 x 1.46 = $102 million.

Madagascar 2
/Madagascar ($63m/$47.2m*) 69.6 x 1.33 = $93 million.

The Two Towers
/The Fellowship of the Ring ($62m*/$47.2m*) 69.6 x 1.31 = $91.4 million.

National Treasure 2
/National Treasure ($44.7m/$35.1m) 69.6 x 1.27 = $88 million.

2 Fast 2 Furious
/Fast and the Furious ($50.4m/$40m) 69.5 x 1.26 = $88 million.

Shanghai Knights
/Shanghai Noon ($19.6m/$15.6m*) 69.6 x 1.26 = $87 million.

Attack of the Clones
/The Phantom Menace ($80m*/$64.8m*) 69.6 x 1.23 = $86 million
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
/Fantastic Four ($58m/$56m) 69.6 x 1.03 = $72 million.
Ocean's 12
/Ocean's 11 ($39.1m/$38.1m) 69.6 x 1.02 = $71 million.

Harry Potter 2
/Harry Potter 1 ($88.3m/$90.2m) 69.6 x 0.98 = $68 million.
Prince Caspian
/Lion, Witch, and Wardrobe ($55m/$65.5m) 69.6 x 0.89 = $62 million.

The Incredible Hulk
/The Hulk ($55.4m/$62.1m) 69.6 x 0.89 = $62 million.
Spider-Man 2
/Spider-Man $88.1m*/$114.8m) 69.6 x 0.76 = $53 million.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: Beginning
/Texas Chainsaw Massacre ($18.5m/$28m) 69.6 x 0.66 = $46 million.

Halloween 2
/Halloween ($16.3m/$26.3m*)
69.6 x 0.62 = $43 million.
Angels and Demons
/The Da Vinci Code ($46.2m/$77m) 69.6 x 0.6 = $41 million.

Scooby Doo 2: Monster's Unleashed
/Scooby Doo ($29.4m/$54.1m) 69.6 x 0.54 = $37 million.

The Grudge 2
/The Grudge
($20.8m/$39.1m) 69.6 x 0.53 = $37 million.
Scary Movie 2/ Scary Movie ($20.5m*/$42.3m) 69.6 x 0.48 = $33 million.

Tomb Raider Cradle of Life
/Tomb Raider ($21.7m/$47.7m) 69.6 x 0.45 = $32 million.

Hostel 2
/Hostel ($8.2m/$19.5m)
69.6 x 0.42 = $29 million.

For those 'fair play' sorts, here are just franchises where both entries had stand-alone three day Fri-Sun opening weekends or both opened on the same day for their four or five-day weekend.
Harold & Kumar... Bay
/Harold& Kumar... White Castle ($14.9m/$5.4m) 69.6 x 2.76 = $192 million.

American Pie 2
/American Pie ($45.1m/$18.7m) 69.6 x = 2.4 = $167 million.

The Ring Two
/The Ring
($35m/$15m) 69.6 x 2.3 = $162 million
The Bourne Supremacy/The Bourne Identity
($52.5m/$27.1m) 69.6 x 1.93 = $134 million.

Night at the Museum 2
/Night at the Museum ($54.1m/$30.4m) 69.6 x = 1.78 = $123 million.

Saw II
/Saw
($31.7m/$18.2m) 69.6 x 1.74 = $121 million.
Quantum Of Solace
/Casino Royale ($67.5m/$40.8m) 69.6x 1.65 = $115 million.

Final Destination 2
/Final Destination ($16m/$10m)
69.6 x 1.6 = $111 million.
X2: X-Men United
/X-Men ($85.5m/$54.4m) 69.6 x 1.57 = $109 million.

The Mummy Returns
/The Mummy ($68.1m/$43.3m) 69.6 x 1.57 = $109 million.

Ice Age: The Meltdown
/Ice Age ($68m/$46.3m) 69.6 x 1.46 = $102 million.

The Two Towers
/The Fellowship of the Ring ($62m*/$47.2m*) 69.6 x 1.31 = $91.4 million
.
National Treasure 2
/National Treasure ($44.7m/$35.1m) 69.6 x 1.27 = $88 million.

2 Fast 2 Furious
/Fast and the Furious ($50.4m/$40m) 69.5 x 1.26 = 88 million.

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
/Fantastic Four ($58m/$56m) 69.6 x 1.03 = $72 million.

Ocean's 12
/Ocean's 11 ($39.1m/$38.1m) 69.6 x 1.02 = $71 million.

Harry Potter 2
/Harry Potter 1 ($88.3m/$90.2m) 69.6 x 0.98 = $68 million.
Prince Caspian
/Lion, Witch, and Wardrobe ($55m/$65.5m) 69.6 x 0.89 = $62 million.

The Incredible Hulk
/The Hulk ($55.4m/$62.1m) 69.6 x 0.89 = $62 million.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: Beginning
/Texas Chainsaw Massacre ($18.5m/$28m) 69.6 x 0.66 = $46 million.

Angels and Demons
/The Da Vinci Code ($46.2m/$77m) 69.6 x 0.6 = $41 million.

Scooby Doo 2: Monster's Unleashed
/Scooby Doo ($29.4m/$54.1m) 69.6 x 0.54 = $37 million.

The Grudge 2
/The Grudge
($20.8m/$39.1m) 69.6 x 0.53 = $37 million.
Tomb Raider Cradle of Life
/Tomb Raider ($21.7m/$47.7m) 69.6 x 0.45 = $32 million.

Hostel 2
/Hostel ($8.2m/$19.5m)
69.6 x 0.42 = $29 million.

Well, that was fun. Wow... that was more thorough than I intended. For all the talk about how Hollywood makes nothing but sequels, there were only around forty original films that received a second theatrical chapter over the last ten years (give or take any one or two that I missed). As we can see, comedies seem to gain the most between chapters (since comedies tend to open smaller and find a bigger life on DVD) while horror sequels generally tend to fair the worst. And, of course, the bigger the opening weekend for the first chapter, the less room for growth for the second one ($69.6 million is pretty huge to begin with). And the list above pretty much proves my 'Tomb Raider trap' theory, since all of the bottom rung entries were sequels to originals that no one liked in the first place, even in cases where the sequels were actually far better films. Where does this leave the probable opening weekend of New Moon? Since (to paraphrase Senor Chang) I am a box-office genius(!), I can predict that Twilight Saga: New Moon will gross between $29 million and $230 million for the Fri-Sun portion.

Scott Mendelson

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Jeff Bridges IS Kris Kristofferson in Crazy Heart...

2012 destroys the global box office as Precious expands and continues to impress. Weekend box office in review (11/15/09)

Roland Emmerich's 2012 almost made back its $260 million budget in just three days. The domestic opening weekend was a whopping $65.2 million and the global total was a mammoth $225 million. This is the seventh-biggest domestic bow ever in November, and just shy of the $67 million that Emmerich's The Day After Tomorrow pulled in during the Fri-Sun portion of its four-day Memorial Day weekend launch in 2004. With its $160 million non-domestic weekend gross, it's also the fifth-largest non-US debut of all time and the all-time non-US debut champ for a non-sequel/franchise picture. So the film pulled in a surprisingly potent 2.8x weekend multiplier and actually had a token increase on Saturday from $23 million to $24 million. Point being, this one is playing as a normal grown-up smash hit and should have decent legs until Avatar comes down the pike in just over a month. See, that's what happens when you actually deliver the goods and have the decency to be not all that bad.

Emmerich's sci-fi adventures have always done around 2/3 of their business overseas (only the US-centric The Patriot had about a 50/50 split). Since the film basically delivers what it promises (full-scale worldwide destruction, tear-jerking melodrama, better than expected acting), it will likely be the second-choice of casual moviegoers for the near future. Expect a big drop (-55%) next weekend as Twilight Saga: New Moon attempts to kick sand in 2012's face, but the film will level off over the long Thanksgiving Day weekend. Roland Emmerich is officially one of the most consistently solid big-time money makers in the book. Independence Day and The Patriot aside, I wish his previous movies were better (fifteen years later, Stargate still stinks), but the man can make trailer-ready movies like no one else. Of course, since 2012 is arguably the Love Actually of disaster flicks, I do wonder where he will go from here. From a genre standpoint, you really can't one-up this one, so it will be interesting to see if Emmerich can find comparative success in different genres. Regardless, $225 million worth of people paid to see Chiwetel Ejiofor and Oliver Platt in starring roles, so that's good news for everyone.

Second place went to Robert Zemeckis's A Christmas Carol, which held fast with just a 25.8% drop in weekend two. The film scored $22.3 million and now has a ten-day total of $63.2 million. It actually had an 8% smaller drop than The Polar Express's second weekend, and its ten-day total is still far ahead of the 12-day $51 million gross of The Polar Express (the latter film opened on a Wednesday). It also grossed about $1 million less on its second weekend than the 2004 picture grossed over its initial Fri-Sun debut. This one should cross $100 million right before the start of the Thanksgiving holiday and will try to reach Polar Express's $162 million total before Avatar steals away its 3D and IMAX screens on December 17th at 12:01am. It will still be an uphill battle to match the $200 million production cost, but the film isn't going to go down without a fight. I'll get to third place in a moment, but fourth place went to The Men Who Stare At Goats, which plunged 51% for a $6.2 million second-weekend. Still, the $5 million acquisition has already grossed $23 million for Overture films, so everything from here on in is pure gravy.

Third place went to this month's unstoppable juggernaut. Last month, Paranormal Activity burst into the top-five on just 169 screens, scoring $7.9 million for a $49,000 per screen average (by the way, congratulations on crossing the $100 million mark on Friday). This month, it's all about Precious. The Lionsgate acquisition grossed $104,000 per screen in 18 theaters last weekend. This weekend it expanded into 174 screens and had to settle for a sad, sorry $33,762 per screen average. At $5.8 million, the critically-acclaimed drama had the second-biggest weekend total for an under 200 screen release (behind you know who). The $10 million picture has now grossed $8.7 million, and it's just getting started. The film is all but guaranteed to receive several major Oscar nominations, and it will go wider next weekend. Precious has become the queen of buzz, with everyone and their brother adding their two-cents in about the film's quality and its alleged racial, gender, and class politics. I think much of the debate is silly, as the movie never pretends to be about every single person who's life resembles the lead character. Any popular movie that isn't about white men or nerd-friendly characters seems to get attacked as being offensive or stereotypical to someone somewhere. But as long as pundits as wringing their hands one way or another, then people will be inclined to check out what all of the fuss is about. Ironically, while Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry did nothing more than procure the film for Lionsgate and put their publicity machines behind it (no small worth), this very well may be the first Tyler Perry-related film to reach $100 million.

Fifth place went to the Michael Jackson documentary This Is It, which at $67.1 million is now the highest-grossing concert film of all time. It also crossed the $200 million mark in global receipts, so all in all a good weekend for something that everyone (including myself) assumed was a one-weekend wonder. Couples Retreat also crossed the $100 million domestic gross mark, so yay for all involved (nice poster, nitwits). The Box dropped 58% and The Fourth Kind dropped 62%, owing mainly to the fact that no one liked either of those films. The only other new opener, Pirate Radio, debuted with just $2.9 million on 882 screens. The Fantastic Mr. Fox debuted on four screens and grossed $265,900 (about $66,475 per screen). The critically-acclaimed Woody Harrelson/Ben Foster war drama The Messenger also debuted on four screens, grossing $11,131 per.

That's all the news that's fit to print. Join us next weekend when the major new releases are the Sandra Bullock drama The Blind Side (a 'you wouldn't believe it if it wasn't a true story' movie) and the animated Planet 51 (basically The Battle For Terra, with more comedy and less genocide). The limited releases are John Woo's Red Cliff and Werner Herzog's Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans. Am I forgetting anything? Oh, right, we get to see if Twilight Saga: New Moon grosses $70 million in its first weekend or in its first day and a half. For more box office, movie reviews, trailer reviews, news commentary, and original essays, go to Mendelson's Memos.

Scott Mendelson

Saturday, November 14, 2009

What to really watch for with New Moon's opening weekend gross.

As of this writing, my local AMC multiplex (the Promenade 16) has allotted twelve of its sixteen auditoriums for Thursday night midnight sneaks of Twilight Saga: New Moon. So while the sky truly seems to be the limit for next weekend's opening, it will be a fascinating one to watch for one simple reason: front-loading. If you recall, Twilight opened with a $35.9 million opening day, which only translated into a $69.6 million three-day opening. That gave the film an all-time record for the worst opening day to weekend multiplier, a stunningly poor 1.9x. That record has since been usurped by The Hanna Montana Movie, which opened on Easter Sunday (with kids out of school) with $17.4 million, but by Sunday was down to just $4.4 million (weekend total - $32.3 million; 1.85x multiplier). Ironically, despite the massive opening weekend front-loading, the film actually played longer than expected, eventually grossing $191 million for a 2.7x weekend to final gross multiplier, which is almost considered leggy in this day and age.

Obviously the optimists are predicting a $100 million+ opening weekend. Is that possible? Sure it is. It would only be an increase of about 43% from opening weekend to opening weekend. That's quite a bit, but it's well in line with other sequels to 'surprise' hits that exploded. Pirates of the Caribbean 2 and The Dark Knight grossed more on their respective opening days ($55 million and $67 million) than the original made in their initial Fri-Sun opening ($43 million and $48 million), and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen came awfully close ($77 million Fri-Sun opening for part 1, $62 million opening day for part 2). Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me and Terminator 2: Judgment Day out-grossed the entire domestic total of their predecessors in the first weekend. A more realistic comparison would be the X-Men series, which went from a $54 million opening weekend for X-Men to an $85 million opening weekend for X2: X-Men United (a 36% increase).

However, there is that pesky front-loading that needs to be discussed. It stands to reason that a sequel would be even more frontloaded than the original, so the weekend multiplier could be even lower this time around. But presuming it stays the same, let's do a quick calculation. In order for Twilight Saga: New Moon to cross the magical $100 million mark in its initial three-day sprint, it will have to gross about $52 million on Friday alone. Again, that's a tough thing to predict (predicting or expecting record-breaking numbers is a dangerous thing), but it's well within the realm of possibility. Of course, despite all of this speculation, let's remember that the sequel will have both the benefit of fan frenzy over the original, as well as the handicap of being a known quantity (anyone that didn't like the first one isn't going to be coming out for opening weekend this time around). So anything resembling the $69 million opening weekend numbers of the original should be considered a big win for this sequel. Second of all, let's keep expectations in check if the film does pull in an astounding opening day figure. Even more so than Harry Potter and X-Men fans, Twilight fans prefer to sample on the first day.

Scott Mendelson

Review: 2012 (2009)

2012
2009
158 minutes
Rated PG-13

by Scott Mendelson

Shock of shocks, Roland Emmerich's 2012 is actually a relatively satisfying genre picture. It avoids the over reliance on family melodrama and romantic entanglements that plagued The Day After Tomorrow. Unlike that global warming epic, this new entry actually delivers on the big-bucks carnage, as the last two hours have a pretty steady flow of destruction, epic death, and near-misses. But most importantly, by filling the cast with stalwart character actors and letting them actually act more often than not, Emmerich has created the best-cast and most cheekily entertaining disaster film since the The Core. The film snob in you may feel guilty in the morning, but 2012 is a better film than any of us could have expected.

Dragged by my disaster-loving wife (she loves Air Emergency, Surviving Disaster, and the like), I went into 2012 expecting the worst. Roland Emmerich hadn't made a good movie since 2000, and his batting average was a pathetic 2/7 thus far (Independence Day and The Patriot being his lone winners). But the thing actually works. The key is that they spent so much money on special effects that they couldn't hire 'stars'. So instead we have a 2.5 hour disaster movie fronted by Chiwetel Ejiofor (acting god), Oliver Platt (character acting god), and Thandie Newton (a vastly untapped resource). Woody Harrelson has great fun as an accurate doomsayer, and Danny Glover wears his Shooter dentures as the President (dig how he says 'catastrophe' during his speech to humanity). Yes we have John Cusack and his ultra-wholesome family (the Curtis clan) that must be reunited, but they weren't nearly as front and center or as syrupy as feared. Oddly enough, this $260 million mega-disaster epic works best as an acting treat. We couldn't care less about the fate of the Curtis family, but we darn well care about the battle of wills between Ejiofor's occasionally naive idealist and Platt's not-always-wrong realist. There is also surprisingly solid work from such pros as Blu Mankuma, George Segal, and Stephen McHattie (he and Lance Henriksen really need to make a movie together).

The film's biggest fault, ironically, is in its unending disaster scenes. While they are copious and technically impressive, too many of them are burdened with the false suspense of watching our archetypical nuclear family escape yet another round of peril. On one hand, we can ignore the characters in peril and sit back and watch the carnage. But, on the other hand, the film has a disturbing undercurrent, where we are supposed to care more about that the Curtis family survived that flood or this earthquake than about the billions who did not. I've always said that the key to Titanic was that Cameron made you feel for every other person on that ship who lost their lives, rather than making Jack and Rose the only victims that mattered. 2012 tries to acknowledge the death of an entire planet, but too many of the disaster scenes are more about thrilling escapes than tragic annihilation. Owing to the PG-13 rating and the family-friendly target, there is a near lack of aftermath to any of the devastation. There are probably fewer onscreen dead bodies than in the equally bloodless Cloverfield.

Still, there is a minimum of melodrama, and the movie is meaner about life and death that you'd expect (one much-hyped farewell moment doesn't go as planned). It's not art, and there is too much unnecessary humor. During the climax, are we really supposed to cheer the revenge of a spurned woman, knowing that a man and his two young sons have been condemned to death? But it's a surprisingly solid popcorn B-movie that works as big-screen entertainment. The movie gets more juice out of its Ejiofor/Platt verbal duels (Ejiofor isn't always right and Platt isn't just an unfeeling evil bureaucrat) than it does out of its end of the world CGI. Despite the 158-minute running time, the film only drags at the very end, where it reaches its natural conclusion at the two-hour mark but still unloads one more unnecessary emergency to drag out the finale. For much of the running time, the film is almost leisurely, and it's an oddly relaxing experience. Yes, the film kinda more or less avoids dealing with the whole 'everyone on earth is going to die' plot thread, but we've got Deep Impact for that.

Grade: B

Friday, November 13, 2009

DVD Review: Gone With the Wind (1939)

Gone With the Wind
1939
Rated G
233 minutes
Available on 2-disc DVD, 6-disc DVD, and Blu Ray on Tuesday, November 17th.
by Scott Mendelson

This is going to be really short, kiddies. Gone With the Wind is, when inflation is accounted for, the most popular theatrical release of all time. So either you love this movie, you hate this movie, or you're a young film geek that never got around to seeing it. Truth be told, if you're in any of the former two categories, you really should pick up the lavish Blu Ray set of this instead. This two-disc DVD collection contains only the feature itself, plus a feature-length commentary, which is (I believe) the same commentary that was on the prior four-disc DVD release from November 2004. But if you don't have access to Blu Ray, you could do worse than this movie-only set. It lacks the copious extras on the four-disc DVD from 2004 as well as the 6-disc DVD set and the Blu Ray collection. On either DVD option, the film looks and sounds better than it ever has and probably ever will in standard-definition. Quick take - if you love the film, buy the Blu Ray or the 6-disc DVD set. If you don't have Blu Ray and don't want a massive case on your bookshelf, pick this up for the improved picture and sound, but keep your older mega-set for the extras. This one is only reccomended as a rental, for the film fan who never got around to seeing this and only plans to watch it once.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Labels