Monday, May 25, 2009

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian takes Memorial Day derby - Mendelson's Memos weekend box office review.

As expected, Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian pulled a rock-solid 3.49x multiplier over its three-day Fri-Sun weekend, grossing $54.1 million. The four-day gross is $70 million. This is a big win for a sequel that most underestimated, not remembering that the first film grossed a whopping $250 million in the US, which tops any X-Men, James Bond, Terminator, Star Trek, Bourne, or Superman picture to date. That initial film opened over Christmas weekend. It had the advantage of arriving right in the middle of Christmas vacation, but had the disadvantage of having its third day occur on the dreaded Christmas Eve. It ended up grossing $30 million over three days and $42 million over four days. It took the first Night at the Museum just over six days to reach the $70 million mark. Like the most successful family films, this sequel had its smallest day on its opening day. To wit, its first four days were - $15.5 million, $20 million, $18..5 million, and a Monday gross of $15.8 million. The biggest single day gross for Night at the Museum was $13.7 million on December 30th, 2006.

Now no one expects this sequel to have the kind of legs that the original had. Quite frankly, December releases are infamous for their long legs. Only in December can a $10 million opening weekend can still net you $90 million if the film is good enough (The Emperor's New Groove in December 2000) or where a $5-6 million opening weekend just before Christmas still get you over the $50 million mark (Sabrina, Mouse Hunt). But still, in this day and age, a $30 million opener going on to cross $200 million without being an actual cultural phenomenon is a rare thing (Cast Away was another freak occurrence over Christmas 2000).

But this boffo opening weekend for Battle of the Smithsonian gives the sequel a little breathing room for the usual quick-kill nature of summer sequels. A mere 3x weekend-to-total gives the film $210 million (using the four-day $70 million total). Even if it performs like the likely 2/3 track of Angels Vs. Demons (which is currently running a bit under 2/3 the pace of The Da Vinci Code), that still gives the film a domestic total of $167 million and an international total of $383 million. The biggest obstacles are the next two weekends, as two powerhouse family projects make their move. Next weekend brings Disney/Pixar's Up and the weekend after that is the Universal Will Ferrell comedy adventure Land of the Lost. If the Ben Stiller vehicle can weather the storm, and the IMAX screens will help with that, then this could easily be a $200 million performer. This is especially true if Up ends up being too depressing for parents and Land of the Lost ends up being too PG-13-y for younger kids. All of this is pure speculation, but one can only speculate in a summer filled with so few sure things.

I've written at length about Terminator Salvation, but the new five-day total is officially $65.3 million. For the record, this is not even close to a flop, but merely a much-too expensive picture that won't measure up to somewhat inflated expectations. (Mis) casting Christian Bale was not enough to make up for the lack of the series's marquee name and this series was not one that justified the $200 million investment. Furthermore, nothing against McG, but Warner Bros. should not have hired a director that was so loathed (fairly or not) by the core geek community. Heck, at least bringing Jonathan Mostow back would have maintained some series continuity. Most importantly, this was a film that should have cost $150 million tops.

The Terminator series has always been a vaguely cult-ish sci-fi property. Terminator 2: Judgment Day was the exception to the rule, due to a killer trailer, its groundbreaking special effects, and its opening right as Arnold Schwarzenegger was at the peak of his fame (he was coming off the crowd-pleasing trio of Twins, Total Recall, and Kindergarten Cop). But because they allowed the budget to spiral past $200 million, a moderately OK box office performance becomes a potential disaster. I've said this a lot and it's worth repeating... studios have to stop spending so much on their major franchise pictures that each and everyone has to all-but break records just to break even. It's easy to applaud Warner Bros. when they throw unlimited funds at The Dark Knight or Harry Potter, and its easy to beat them up when they do the same for Speed Racer or Poseidon. But this is an industry-wide problem. DVDs aren't going to save you anymore and you can't always count on a doubling or tripling of the domestic gross overseas.

Anyway, moving on, Star Trek continued to prove me dead wrong with another below-50% dip in weekend three (the 3-day to 3-day weekend drop was 46.8%). Direct competition with Terminator Salvation prevented the film from equaling last weekend's three day take over the four-day weekend, but its four-day $29.3 million take (and $22 million three-day take) pushed its total to $191 million. Alas, it will have to wait a day or two at most to overtake Monsters Vs. Aliens ($193.7 million) as the year's highest grossing film. It's still petering out a little quicker than the word of mouth and general audience excitement would account for, but next weekend will be the one of reckoning. If it holds up, it'll make it to $250 million+ and become the inflation-adjusted highest-grossing Star Trek picture of all time (that would be the $235 million adjusted gross for Star Trek: The Motion Picture). If it crumbles, it'll stop dead at a still terrific $225 million. Either way, Paramount is playing long term with this franchise, so the sky is the limit for the eventual sequel.

Angels & Demons dropped a disturbing 53% in its second three-day weekend (40.7% if you count all four days). Still, the original film dropped a larger 55%, but this sequel is still pulling in the expected 2/3 business of The Da Vinci Code. No surprises here, although I'm sure that Sony would have preferred a $100 million+ gross for the end of the second weekend, but $87.5 million isn't so bad. This will cross $100 million next weekend and probably has another $30 million left (especially as Sony is stupidly releasing the adult-thriller June alternative, The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 in two weeks). Not a major performance, but (as expected) the international numbers are coming to the rescue. The eleven-day international total is already $286 million.

Dance Movie opened to $12.62 million over four days. I couldn't care less, and you probably don't either. Moving on (for a spoof that actually feels like a 1980s ZAZ comedy, try Superhero Movie). X-Men Origins: Wolverine posted another 45.1% three-day to three-day weekend drop in its fourth weekend. Its $8 million three-day and $9.9 million four-day took the picture over the $165 million mark. It'll crap out at $180 million, and the international business is doing just fine. The current international total, not counting this weekend's overseas gross, is $310 million. Ironically, for all the insane circumstances surrounding this movie's production and release (amazing how Fox never found whomever leaked that bootleg), this one pretty much did the business that it was always likely going to do. It was never going to play like Iron Man or even a top-flier X-Men sequel, and it was lucky that it didn't end up like a Hulk film. I still can't wait for the director's commentary on the DVD/Blu Ray.

And that's pretty much all the news that's fit to print. Join us next weekend when Up makes the obligatory $50-70 million over opening weekend and Sam Raimi returns to horror with the ridiculous (but often ridiculously fun) Drag Me To Hell.

Scott Mendelson

Did Christian Bale wreck Terminator Salvation? CHUD article explains, in detail, what went wrong with T4.

Here is a lengthy, fascinating article detailing the various script changes that occurred during the shoot of Terminator Salvation. I'm not going to rehash what's in there, but the biggest shocker is that the main culprit behind the narrative failure of the film may have been Christian Bale himself. I'm not alone in thinking he was miscast as John Conner and that the role of Conner was awfully thin, but it appears that McG originally wanted to cast him as Marcus and only have Conner appearing in a token cameo. Bale's insistence on playing John Conner allegedly forced massive rewrites to beef up the non-existent John Conner character. Frankly, if this is true, this puts Christian Bale in a far worse light than any onset temper tantrum. It's one thing to throw an emotional hissy fit in a fleeting moment. It's another to force an entire production to completely overhaul the screenplay to give the token character that you wanted to play an upgrade to starring role, completely unpending the intended narrative of the picture.

I'd still love to know about the 40-minutes of missing footage, and I'll let you know if I dig anything up, but this is an interesting and unexpected scenario. I know full well that many big stars have their own staff of script doctors to tailor a screenplay to their liking, but I've never heard of a big star demanding to play a role intended as a cameo and then forcing said role to take center stage in the present plot line. It might very well be the case that the villain in this story is not the studio, but the star.

Scott Mendelson

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Judgment Day for Terminator Salvation ($43 million in 3 days)...

Unlike everyone else with a blog/web site, I do prefer to wait till the final numbers roll in before discussing box office at length (part of that is convenience, as I'm usually playing with my daughter when the Sunday estimates roll in). So here's the top-ten list for now, and I'll discuss everything non-Terminator related on Monday night or Tuesday. For now, it's time for to face facts about a certain beloved sci-fi franchise.

There was no major Saturday bounce. Grosses actually went down 1.6% from Friday to Saturday. Terminator Salvation is officially in trouble. I was bending over backwards to be fair, not wanting to the be the sort of pundit to condemn a movie as a financial disappointment after just one or two days. But while the three-day total is $43 million, which is just below the three-day opening Fri-Sun for Terminator 3, the five day total is expected to be a bit less than the $72 million that Rise of the Machines pulled in over July 4th weekend in 2003. The $56 million four-day total is already $3 million behind the Jonathan Mostow sequel, and it's only going downhill from here.

Ironically, it may be a matter of expectations. Everyone expected that the third Terminator film was going to be a cash grab, designed to give Arnold Schwarzenegger one last payday before his California gubernatorial run. Unless I'm mistaken, it's near-record $170 million budget was caused partially by the actor's insistence on shooting in Los Angeles, in order to boost the economy of the business capital of the state he wanted to run. Cringe-inducing trailers highlighting the campier elements did not help. But the film shocked critics and audiences by actually being pretty good, with tight, low-key character interplay and some astonishing action beats (plus a stunningly powerful finale). So it was able to weather the one-two onslaught of Pirates of the Caribbean and Bay Boys 2. The film pulled in $150 million in the US and nearly $300 million overseas for a profitable $433 million total.

Comparitively, for whatever reason, expectations were high for the fourth installment. I'm honestly not sure why. Yes Christian Bale is a great actor, but he was no more suited to play John Conner than Kevin Costner was to play Robin Hood (Bale may have a reputation as a gloomy brooder, but most of his characters are lively mad men). While I have nothing against McG and rather enjoyed the first Charlies Angels, his name did not inspire confidence amongst the masses. So why did everyone expect this to be something other than a bigger budget variation on Reign of Fire, with robots filling in for dragons (and minus the character development)? Why didn't we expect Warner Bros. to (apparently) panic over the collapse of Watchmen and demand a PG-13, action-filled theatrical cut? The trailers promised atmosphere and action, and that's what the picture delivered on in spades. I'm not saying the movie is a wrongly condemned masterpiece, but I think the movie turned out about how we all should have known it would had we been thinking logically.

So the film will likely end its first five days with about $66 million. After that, lousy word of mouth and negative press will keep it fighting to even approach the $150 million that part 3 reached. The official budget, which was funded by six private production companies, is 'only' $200 million but, and I mean this as a compliment, I don't believe that for a second. The ad campaign has been super-saturation level as well, so this very expensive marketing investment could hurt Warner Bros. in a mass-layoff kinda way, since Columbia has the rights for international distribution (and this film could very well double or triple its domestic take overseas). The saving grace for Warner's domestic investment may be the DVD/Blu Ray release that may or may not contained some kind of extended cut involving that 40 minutes of deleted footage. Here's hoping that WB Home Video doesn't wimp out Ala Speed Racer and just cancel all of the already completed bonus materials.

With Terminator Salvation, Observe & Report, and Watchmen under performing to varying degrees, Warner Bros' decision to move Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince to July is now an unmitigated stroke of genius. It's now up to 'the boy who lived' to save the studio, as well as the world. Who would have thought that Warner Bros' highest grossing picture of 2009, heading into July, would be Gran Torino?

Scott Mendelson

DVD Review: Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus (2009)

Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus
2009
88 minutes
Not Rated

by Scott Mendelson

Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus is the finest monster movie since the original Jurassic Park, and probably the out and out scariest movie since Frailty. The creature effects are photo-real and absolutely terrifying, bringing back dreaded memories of The Relic and The Host. Deborah Gibson will soon join Jennifer Hudson as a beloved singer-turned-actress to win an Academy Award for her film debut. It is rich with high-class scares, including the best 'gotcha' moment since Samuel L. Jackson's big speech in Deep Blue Sea. It is visually glorious and emotionally potent. It is a line drawn in the sand from The Asylum, a declaration that it is the new king of the straight-to-DVD horror genre. In an insane world, it is the sanest choice.

I wish it were so. You have no idea how much I wish it were so. But it's not. The actors are all appropriately terrible and the story is completely absurd (and Debbie Gibson is still as much of a hottie as she was when I was seven-years old). I wish someone had given the filmmakers the necessary $30 million to make this the cult classic it deserves to be. I wish that the Aquarium Of the Pacific in Longbeach, California wouldn't have to stand in for the Tokyo Science Institute. But at the end of the day, the film does not have the money to live up to its potential. While the shark is indeed mega and the octopus is in fact giant, their battle, both with each other and the humans in their path, is muted and lifeless.

The plot - Um... this is easy. Ice breaks and two ginormous prehistoric creatures escape to roam wild on the sea. In the American corner, you have the megalodon shark, while the Japanese realm contains an unexplained giant octopus. Since Dr. Doolittle and Aquaman are both unavailable (would the Beastmaster have helped?) the ancient creatures make short work of those unlucky enough to cross its path. After two acts of the creatures inflicting mass casualties on the human populace (mostly off screen, natch), a brilliant marine scientist (Deborah Gibson), her new found Japanese counterpart, and her grizzled, daffy mentor decide to pit the creatures against each other, for the mother of... make that developmentally challenged third cousin once removed of all aquatic showdowns. The snarky Lorenzo Lamas (as a shady government operative) disagrees, but he eventually remembers the title of the film and lets them proceed.

In a way, this film represents a true to form grind house picture, in that the filmmakers really don't have the money to give the audience that which they came to see, so they just clog the running time with character conflict and lengthy 'investigations'. There are a few choice moments of animal action, but they are few and far between. And, if you're a fan of giant octopuses, you're in for a real letdown. Similar to Freddy Vs. Jason, the film clearly picks a favorite as the shark ends up committing 90% of the onscreen violence in the picture (in FvJ, Fred Kruger killed I think one person in the actual present-tense narrative).


As expected, the best thing about Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus is the trailer, and the concept itself. Due to the obvious limitations, the film is unable to deliver on its promise of mass carnage nor an epic duel to the death between monstrous sea creatures. For a straight-to-DVD monster movie that actually delivers, check out Mega Snake. It has a giant snake, you see the snake a lot, and the giant snake kills many people in an onscreen and gruesome fashion. Mega Snake still remains one of my daughter Allison's favorite films. As for this new entry, we let her stay up to watch it with us. At about the 30-minute mark, she wanted to go back into the crib. So yes, Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus bores babies to sleep.

Grade: C-

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Friday box office - Night at the Museum eclipses Terminator Salvation

The list...
As expected by many (including myself), Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian took the top spot away from Terminator Salvation on its first night. The sequel to the insanely leggy 2006 family favorite took in $15.3 million, while Terminator Salvation took in $14.8 million on its second day of release. For comparison, the first Night at the Museum took in $12.1 million on opening day, but it only managed an opening weekend of $30 million, since its first Sunday fell on the box office black hole known as Christmas Eve. From the looks of things, the three-day total will be around or above $45 million, putting this franchise right in line with the National Treasure series (the $35 million opening original gave way to a $45 million opening sequel). I'd just assume not speculate too much until the full weekend numbers are in. Family-driven matinees could absolutely explode over the weekend, leading to a three-day total well over $50 million (a 3.5x multiplier would give it $54 million for the three-day weekend). But this is a rock-solid, if not spectacular start for a film that most expected to place second for the weekend.

But with Saturday, Sunday, and Monday matinees now in play, Terminator Salvation is now doomed to come in second for the weekend. At this point, there is no reason to assume that it's not playing like and old-fashioned, adult-skewing hit that will peak on Saturday instead of opening day (think Indiana Jones 4 or King Kong). For example, the $14.8 million looks like only a token 11% uptick from its opening Thursday, if you take away the $3 million in midnight showings, then the Thursday to Friday bounce becomes a more impressive 35% increase. Tomato/tomata perhaps, but its too soon to write this one off quite yet (Saturday is this film's day of reckoning).

As of this moment, the two-day total is still right in line with the $28 million earned by Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, and the former sequel had the advantage of opening in the middle of summer vacation (while this new sequel had the advantage of six years worth of inflation). By Monday, it should be sitting right around the $72 million that Terminator 3 earned over the five-day Fourth of July weekend. Those who are making negative comparisons to Fast & Furious should remember that the three-day total for T3 ($44 million) was still under the three-day opening weekend of 2 Fast 2 Furious ($50 million) in the summer of 2003.

For the record, I still think it was beyond stupid for Warner Bros. to open this one a day early. First of all, by splitting the opening day audience into two non-vacation days, you basically ended up with two middling box office days as opposed to one superior opening day. I'd imagine that WB would be more impressed with a $20-$25 million opening day that blew away Night at the Museum 2, as opposed to a $28 million two-day total. Second of all, the film isn't all that good, and the extra day has just given the general audiences one extra day to tell their friends as the weekend rolls on. I call this the 'Godzilla Rule': if your movie isn't all that good, do NOT open it early and allow bad word of mouth to spread prior to the Fri-Sun weekend (see also - Matrix Revolutions and Superman Returns).

Angels & Demons fell a disturbing 63% from last Friday, which is especially troubling as the opening day wasn't particularly front-loaded. Barring a miracle (no pun intended), Angels & Demons will not quite reach the $100 million mark by Monday (its Friday total is $63 million). Star Trek fell 51% on its first non-IMAX buffered day (although apparently many IMAX theaters are still doing midnight Star Trek IMAX showings), which means it'll still spend its third weekend with a drop of well under 50%. I'd favor Star Trek to take third place for the overall weekend, as geeks who felt burned by Terminator Salvation or decided to heed their friends' advice and not go at all... they are far more likely to check out Star Trek than Angels & Demons. It'll be close, but Star Trek should eclipse the (estimated) $193 earned by Monsters Vs. Aliens by Monday.

More to come as the final numbers roll in over the weekend.

Scott Mendelson

The irony is not lost on me...




Friday, May 22, 2009

Terminator Salvation debuts with $13.4 million.

Warner Bros. better hope and pray that audiences are just waiting to see Terminator Salvation at their convenience over the weekend, which they probably are (it's not a rush out and see immediately franchise for most people). But if this first-day $13.4 million Thursday number (which includes $3 million in midnight screenings) is in any way front-loaded or indicative of the demand for this picture, then Warner Bros is in serious trouble. Again, if the picture does $20 million or more tomorrow, then no harm no foul. Not every film opening over a long weekend explodes and peaks on opening day (think Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull or Shrek 2), but those slow builders are usually the exceptions.

Regardless, the troubling fact is that this fourth Terminator, despite the PG-13 rating, and slightly higher profile, made about $3 million less than the opening 1.5 days of Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines way back in July of 2003 (it had $4 million in Tuesday evening or midnight screenings and $12.4 million in Wednesday grosses). Now the T3 had the luxury of opening in the middle of summer vacation but, adjusted for inflation, the opening Thursday for Terminator Salvation is just under the first Thursday (second day of play) for Terminator 3. The reviews have been mainly lousy, even the fan boys are up in arms, so the word of mouth is an open question. It's worth remembering that while it may be cool to bash Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines today, the film maintains a 70% positive at Rotten Tomatoes, which is nearly double the fresh rating that this next sequel has earned. I'm wondering if critics and geeks are overcompensating and trashing Terminator Salvation as a result of the unabashed worship that they bestowed on the also not-that-great Star Trek two weeks ago. None the less, we'll know if this is just a bump in the road by tomorrow morning.

While Warner Bros. probably wanted an extra day to pad the total weekend take to make sure they were ahead of Night at the Museum 2 by Monday night, all they may have done is bought themselves a day or two of negative publicity by effectively slicing their opening day take into two days and thus making both days look underwhelming. We'll see.

Scott Mendelson

Thursday, May 21, 2009

First pictures from M. Night Shyamalan's The Last Airbender

I've never seen the critically acclaimed Nickelodeon show, Avatar: The Last Airbender, that this film is based on, but it's only three seasons long, so I really ought to get around to it over the next year. The USA Today article is mainly a puff piece, but the Slashfilm article has a nice film-to cartoon character comparison. The latter article states that the teaser will be debuting with fellow Paramount tent pole spectacle Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen.

Come what may, this is certainly a shot across the bow to everyone who complains that M. Night Shyamalan never changes his template. I'm not sure I agree with that (truth be told, his only two pure thrillers were Signs and The Happening), but it certainly may do him some good to direct someone else's material for a change. I still say he should try a musical. It would be slow, ponderous, filled with empathic characters, and most of the singing would happen offscreen. Anyway, The Last Airbender opens July 2nd, 2010.

Scott Mendelson

And the IMAX switchover of 2009 continues with Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian. Plus some thoughts on the IMAX/not IMAX debate.

Just for the record, if the Star Trek grosses for weekend three take a slightly bigger dive than expected, you might need to remember that it won't have the IMAX advantage that it had in its two previous weekends. After a mere two-week engagement, the Paramount picture is being supplanted by the 20th Century Fox tent pole, Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian. Whether the film is good or bad (I didn't care much for the first one), I must confess that this is a refreshingly appropriate choice to receive the enhanced IMAX treatment. After all, until recently, IMAX screens were mainly the mainstay of museums that used them to show shorter educational features. The film actually had its official premiere at the Smithsonian IMAX theater in Washington, DC. What better cross promotion than a big budget film series that is set in a museum which features various historical characters coming to life?*

Oh, and about that ridiculous ongoing debate about the new digital IMAX screens popping up in retrofitted conventional movie theaters, here's the thing: IMAX is not just about screen size. It's about picture quality, sound quality, and the theoretical ability to completely immerse yourself in the film. Yes some of the original screens are 72-feet tall, but that's not a requirement. This Wired article sums up the issue nicely. As for actor Aziz Ansari, who started this debate with a critical blog entry about paying for an IMAX ticket at the AMC Burbank 16 and being dissatisfied with the screen size, I have two things. First of all, you can't watch the whole movie and then go out to the ticket booth and demand a refund. Just like you can't eat your whole steak and then complain that it was overcooked. Second of all, he claims he drove out of his way to see Star Trek in IMAX. Fair enough, but (out of pure curiosity) the heck didn't he just drive about five minutes 'that way' to the Universal City Walk theater with a truly giant 'traditional' IMAX screen?

I happened to have seen Monsters Vs. Aliens 3D at the AMC Burbank 16 several weeks ago. I knew darn well that the screen wasn't as big, but the showtime and location was more convenient than the Universal City Walk, I didn't have to pay for parking, and I wanted to try out the newfangled IMAX. Guess what? It was still a completely immersive experience, so much so that I almost enjoyed the otherwise mediocre movie. Sure for something that I truly want to drown myself in (Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, Transformers 2: Revenge of The Fallen), I'll do my best to get to the Universal City Walk. But for other films that happen to be available in IMAX (cough-Night at the Museum 2-cough), I'll gladly accept a 90% IMAX experience for 300% more convenience. I live in Woodland Hills, so I have yet another new IMAX screen at the AMC Promenade 16.

As IMAX becomes the new normal for tent pole pictures, theaters have no choice but to find a way to meet the demand. And its a good thing that those who would otherwise have to drive hours to find an old-fashioned IMAX screen to now have a comparable option at their local megaplex. If size is the key factor, then consumers have the choice to not pay the premium price for an up-converted IMAX film (or they can just sit really close to the screen). Just remember, if you walk into your local mall theater and see that it now has an IMAX auditorium, don't be shocked when they didn't magically put a 72 foot long screen right next to the food court.

Scott Mendelson

* In case you're curious, an IMAX contact graciously provided me with a list of museum-specific theaters that are playing Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian.

Alabama
Birmingham – IMAX Dome Theatre at McWane Centre
District of Columbia
Washington - Samuel C. Johnson IMAX Theater at the National Museum of Nat. History
Washington – Lockheed Martin IMAX Theater at the Smithsonian Institute
Florida
Fort Lauderdale – AutoNation® IMAX® Theater at Museum of Discovery and Science
St. Augustine – World Golf Hall of Fame IMAX Theatre
Iowa
Des Moines – Science Center of Iowa & Blank IMAX Dome Theater
Maryland
Baltimore – Maryland Science Center IMAX Theater
Michigan
Dearborn – The Henry Ford IMAX Theatre
New York
Garden City – Leroy R. and Rose W. Grumman IMAX Dome Theater
North Carolina
Raleigh – Wachovia IMAX Theatre at Marbles Kids Museum
Pennsylvania
Harrisburg – Select Medical IMAX Theater at The Whitaker Center
Texas
Austin – The Bob Bullock Texas State History Museum IMAX Theatre
Fort Worth – Fort Worth Museum Omni Theater
Houston – Wortham IMAX Theatre
Washington
Seattle – Pacific Science Center Boeing IMAX Theatre

Jonathan Mostow's comeback, The Surrogates, now has a trailer.

I'm a big Jonathan Mostow fan. I loved Breakdown, rather appreciated U-571 and, yes I darn well enjoyed the low-key and grim Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (yes, it's better than the butchered theatrical cut of Terminator Salvation). So I'm certainly glad to see that he's back in the game after six long years. Along with this Bruce Willis action vehicle, he also is allegedly directing the Sub-Mariner adaptation for Marvel, plus he has his nose in that would-be Escape From New York remake (guess what, the original isn't very good) and a Swiss Family Robinson update.

And this looks like an uncommonly intriguing science-fiction thriller, with a premise that is just a little similar to Strange Days, and equally enticing (basically people have robot surrogates that live their lives for them). However, BIG WARNING, the last scene of the trailer may or may not contain a huge spoiler. Something happens that I would assume happens near the end of the film. Maybe I'm wrong, but just in case, you should view this trailer at your own discretion.

Scott Mendelson

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Labels