Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Wait a minute...

Speaking of The Brave One, I did finally see it when it came out on BluRay early this year. It's not very good, but it does have one priceless scene about forty-minutes in.

Jodie Foster's fiancee has been murdered, and she's desperate to get a gun. So she walks into a gun store. Alas, the gun store owner won't sell her a piece right away because of a variation on the Brady Bill. She leaves in frustration and another customer follows her out and offers to sell her an illegal gun for $1,000. Two things of note...

A) Unless the gun store owner is in cahoots with the black market gun dealer, I'd imagine that scheme would only work once or twice. After all, surely the owner would notice this guy who stands around his store, never buys anything, and then follows any disgruntled customer out of the store and comes back happy. Suspicious?

B) In this scene, we have Jodie Foster being upset and outraged because she can't buy a handgun right away. She can't buy this handgun right away because of The Brady Bill. Jodie Foster plays a character who gets upset over the Brady Bill. Think about that for a minute...

Scott Mendelson

Final Weekend numbers...

Sorry for the delay...

The List


With a summer where the well-reviewed movies were big hits (Iron Man, Wall-E) and the few bombs or disappointments were more or less panned (Speed Racer, The Love Guru, The Happening), it pays to remember that more often that not, critics do not affect opening weekend for the general masses. Opening weekend is about marketing, awareness, and blind interest in a particular movie.

On that note, Hancock gave a giant middle-finger to critics and pundits by grossing a more than solid $62.6 million over the Friday-Sunday portion of the long weekend, closing out it's opening 5.5 days with just under $104 million. This is the fourth-largest July 4th opening behind Spider-Man 2 ($88 million 3-day, $150 million five-day), Transformers, and War Of The Worlds. Even if word of mouth is toxic and the competition proves too heavy, the film is still a lock for $200 million domestic. In general, July 4th releases do anywhere from 22% to 29% of their total in their opening Friday-Sunday portion. Even if Hancock did 30% of its final over the opening weekend, that's still $208 million (25% = $250 million, which is not likely).

This is also Will Smith's second-largest three-day take, second only to last Christmas's fluke I Am Legend, which made $77 million off a perfect storm of factors that should not be considered the norm (good reviews, terrific trailers, best release date of the year, no competition, curiosity surrounding The Dark Knight trailers). I Am Legend eventually ended up with $257 million. If Hancock comes anywhere close to that, Will Smith could be setting himself up as a target in the future when his grosses return to their normal levels ($140-170 million). Come what may, this is a terrific number for an unfairly maligned film.

Wall-E took a surprising tumble, losing 48% (a lot for a cartoon), taking in $33 million for a ten-day total of $128 million. The good news is that Wall-E's first ten day gross is still ahead of Kung-Ku Panda (which should cross $200 million next weekend), Cars, and Ratatouille. So, again, even in the worst case scenario, and this large drop isn't a fluke due to competition and July 4th falling on a Friday (always a bad thing), this should still out gross Ratatouille and should squeak past Kung Fu Panda. It has no chance of making Finding Nemo or even The Incredibles/Monsters Inc numbers, but it should get close to if not surpass the $245 million that Toy Story 2 and Cars ended up at. Considering how offbeat and challenging this cartoon is, that's gotta be a huge win for Pixar.

In the catagory of huge drops that deserved it, Wanted plummeted a delightful 61% to about $21 million. Darn shame, that is, really. Anyway, I must conceed that this soulless, stupid, and condescendingly terrible film is a decent hit, crossing the $90 million mark after ten days. This $75 million picture will likely struggle to equal the $131 million that Tomb Raider grossed back in 2001. It sure isn't coming anywhere near the $187 million that Mr. And Mrs. Smith grossed (off a nearly indentical $50 million opening). Ironically, with $193 million, Kung Fu Panda just passed Mr. And Mrs. Smith to become Angelina Jolie's highest grossing picture to date. Anyway, expect this to be another textbook 'quick-kill blockbuster' and do over 40% of its final total in the first three days.

Get Smart ended weekend three with $98.1 million (couldn't Warner found an extra $2 million somewhere?) and is still holding steady. This one cost $80 million, but some of that and alot of the marketing costs were paid for by product plugs and various tie-ins.

The Incredible Hulk... ok, you know where I'm going with this. One more time -
-Current gross - $125 million.
-Probable Final Domestic gross of Hulk 2.0 - $140 million. Budget of Hulk 2.0 - $160 million.
-Actual Final Domestic gross of Hulk 2003 - $132 million. Budget of Hulk 2003 - $130 million.
-Inexplicable decision to spend more money for a sequel than the massively disliked original grossed, then being astounded as said sequel loses more money than the original. Priceless! Nice work Marvel.

The only other major development is the bombing (relative to expectations) of Kit Kittridge: An American Girl. After two weeks of terrific limited release business, the well-reviewed family film went wide with over 1800 screens over the holiday weekend... and no one cared. A $3.2 million opening. $5.6 million gross thus far. To be fair, at a budget of $10 million, Warner Bros. will eventually make money off of this, especially with DVD sales.

Still, I wonder if the only reason that Warner Bros. spent the money for the wide-release was to deflect (false) charges of studio sexism leveled by Deadline Hollywood's Nikki Finke Late last year, WB honcho Jeff Robinov made statements basically blaiming the failures of The Reaping, The Invasion, and The Brave One on the lack of interest in female-driven movies. Whether that was a fair assessment (not really, all three movies were terrible with troubled production histories), and whether the executives harbor sexist attitudes (certainly probable), the WB slate speaks for itself. Yes, that's right, the studio that brought you The Brave One, The Invasion, The Reaping, Sex & The City, Kit Kittredge: An American Girl, Sisterhood Of The Traveling Pants 2, He's Just Not That Into You, and The Women is sexist at the core!

Scott Mendelson

Monday, July 7, 2008

How the opinions of 'they' affects the opinions of 'me'.

Here is a nice little piece by The Los Angeles Times' Kenneth Turan and the even better response by Dave Poland about how the effects of other critics often infect your/our/my own criticism of a given movie. Although it's more noticeable this summer (witness the instant mass lynching of Hancock and Speed Racer, vs the trip-over-themselves adultation of Iron Man and Wanted), there has always been the 'gang' aspect of film criticism. Whomever sees the movie first often sets the tone for the criticism to follow, and often that is the only reason to be first. Although I hope to god that they are right, want to bet that if Peter Travers had panned The Dark Knight two weeks ago, that the reviews from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter would not have been quite so positive?

One of my first reviews was of the 'bear whisperer' documentary Grizzly Man. Having not read any reviews, I entered into the 2005 movie relatively blind, and I absolutely loathed the picture. Imagine my astonishment when I banged out my review only to read nearly every critic and columnist I knew calling it a masterpiece, a classic, one of the best documentaries ever, etc. Did I change my opinion? Nope. I still hated Timothy Treadwell and have no wish to spend any time with the delusional fraud. Did I wonder if I had missed something elemental that precluding me from joining in the chorus? Of course I did. Especially as a novice film critic, it's tough being the only one.

Whether I'm the one guy who hated Spider-Man 2 and liked Fantastic Four, or you're the lonely soul who hated Almost Famous and Fellowship Of The Ring, there is and always has been a herd mentality. I had a film professor who once said (incorrectly) that if you don't like a critically praised film that you were missing something. No, it couldn't be that the movie didn't work for you, or that you weren't as approving as the critical masses, it must have been that you missed something that everyone else noticed and that you should see it again. He was wrong. Criticism is by its nature a subjective medium. No matter how much others try to persuade you, and the end of the day your feelings are your feelings in regards to any work of art. Yes it is absolutely possible to change your mind down the road upon reviewings (I now prefer The Mummy to The Mummy Returns, and I prefer The Living Daylights to Licence To Kill), but in the end it is your feelings that determine a piece of art's value, not how high the Tomato Meter is or whether your friends all liked it.

It's tough climbing uphill in the world of film criticism. It's tough being the only person to dislike Transformers, to dislike Iron Man, and to love Speed Racer. Doesn't mean I'm right anymore than it means they're wrong. And, if group-think really is the culprit, then history will judge these films in a far more fair manner than the current 'instant narrative' (Turan gives the classic example of Vertigo, widely panned in 1958, now considered one of Hitchcock's best). I firmly believe that Spider-Man 2 will suffer the same fate as the similarly plotted Superman II, an allegedly improved sequel that will plummeted in esteem compared to the original as the years went by. But don't let the early reviews color your appreciation of a movie. Just because Variety hated it, doesn't mean you won't love it. And it doesn't make you wrong.

Scott Mendelson

Sunday, July 6, 2008

A trailer worth watching...

It's nice to see a good trailer about a seemingly worthwhile movie that you know nothing about. So with that, I won't spoil anything other than to say that Lakeview Terrace opens on September 14th. Enjoy...




If you want to download, try Movie-List.

Scott Mendelson

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Review: The Happening (2008)

The Happening
2008
91 minutes
Rated R

by Scott Mendelson

Critics were wrong on Speed Racer, wrong on Wanted, wrong on Hancock. What about one of the alleged super-turds of the summer? Well... they aren't completely wrong, but there is hope. First of all, two very important things about The Happening...

1) It's obvious that M. Night Shyamalan had absolutely no interest in making an R-rated film. Despite my amusement about Fox's marketing campaign, and the extra interest that said rating probably garnered, this is easily one of the softest R-rated movies I have ever seen. No sex or nudity, no hard profanity that I can recall, and very little graphic violence. The television edit of this film will be maybe five-seconds shorter. M Night's previous films had a realistic, clinical take on the violence that made it more disturbing than the usual splatter. There are a couple scenes that capture that 'son of two doctors' visual (for example, a close up of a realistically broken body that has just fallen off a building), but most of the content is shot from far away and cuts away far sooner than you'd expect. My guess is that the subject matter itself guaranteed that the film would garner an R-rating, and that Fox asked Shyamalan to toss in a little gore for gore's sake.

2) Mark Walhburg should never, ever appear in a mainstream tent pole movie that requires him to play an everyman and someone of great intelligence. He couldn't do it in Planet Of The Apes, and he's quite terrible here. He's perhaps the least convincing onscreen educator in the history of celluloid. I've always preferred his brother Donnie, and even he would have been more convincing as a blue-collar science teacher. The film is plenty flawed aside from him, but his stunningly awful performance is probably 60% of the reason the movie doesn't work as well as it should. The majority of the acting has an odd stilted, quasi-realistic quality, like a cross between super-realism and surreal 1950s horror acting. It doesn't always work, but it keeps you on edge in a way that conventional performances might not have.

Most of you know the general plot at this point and I won't spoil much for those that don't, but the first forty-five minutes of this eighty-five minute movie are surprisingly compelling. There are enough scary, nasty jolts and clever violence to keep you just on edge (I particularly like the 'recycling pistol'). Again, the acting is odd, and the plot choices are a little off (when a train stops suddenly mid-journey and forces everyone to de-board, only our hero asks the train operators just what is going on), but there is a palatable sense of menace and dread. I like how the news reports are realistically panicked and confused, often giving out false information and wild theorizing.

Random note 1 - As I was watching the movie, it occurred to me, with no small amusement, that two places likely not to be affected by the incidents would be Mel Gibson's farm from Signs and the colonial town from The Village. Random note 2 - If you're going to have characters using the word 'happening' in a dramatic fashion a good dozen or so times, don't call your movie The Happening. It's a big pet peeve of mine when characters shoe-horn the title of the movie into the narrative, and it 'happens' a whole bunch here (the oddly named James Bond movies, like Tomorrow Never Dies, The Living Daylights, or Die Another Day, do this every time).

Zooey Deschanel seems to be playing a realistically screwed up person, to the point where it's (realistically) off putting at times. Still, I like that it's all but stated that she had a very screwed up childhood (did she see dead people as a child?), but that childhood trauma is never spelled out or even stated. The rest of the cast does what they can, even when the plot makes them make boneheaded choices. For example, John Leguizamo eventually leaves his daughter in the care of Wahlburg and Deschanel in order to find his wife. But, really, considering the nature of the calamity, his wife is either completely healthy and completely able to save herself, or she's already dead and there's no hope. Under those circumstances, you stay with your kid so she doesn't either end up an orphan or die alone.

There are genuine Shyamalan touches, especially in the eccentricity of the characters. The older lady that figures into the third act (Betty Buckley) is inexplicably crazy, but yet a symbolic explanation for her character is undone by the plot. She just seems to be batty for no particular reason (Wahlburg does his worst acting in his scenes with Buckley). Deschanel is cooky too, as is the gardener who is rather plausibly offers an explanation for the carnage while obsessing about hot dogs. It's actually the occasionally quirky dialogue, rather than the rote violence, that makes this feel like a Shyamalan film. For the record, I adore how the romantic subplot, Deshanel's guilt over having an almost-date with an attractive coworker, is dealt with. Wahlburg's speech involving cough syrup, as well as a brief beat involving him getting relationship advice from two kids, is the highlight of the movie.

Despite my praise of the above, the entire last third of the movie really drags and the movie just sort of ends, halfheartedly, without a real climax. Granted, the end of the movie is rooted more in character drama than in the thriller staples, but you need something, anything, to get a rise out of the audience in the end. Of course, this is the big problem with the movie. Quirky acting, odd pacing, weird plot choices... all of that would be manageable save for a threat that, once revealed, really can't be dealt with in any cinematic fashion. Again, avoiding spoilers, but once you know what's going on, you basically wait for the problem to ride itself out. This may be realistic, but it's not entertaining.

I stand by what I wrote last over the last month or so. Even a bad Shyamalan movie is more interesting than the bland, try nothing, accomplish nothing confections that make up the majority of the suspense/horror/thriller genre. I can't quite recommend The Happening, but it has enough quirky and intense touches to absolutely recommend a rental (especially those using mail order services). Shyamalan still has to discipline himself, he still needs to learn how to end a movie that contains no twist (of his pictures, only Signs avoids a twist AND ends successfully). But The Happening is not a complete catastrophe and it has more to like than 90% of the horror films so far this year. That's not saying much, but it is saying something. How's this for a pull quote? - "M. Night Shyamalan: Scott Mendelson still hasn't given up on him."

Grade: C

Monday, June 30, 2008

Weekend Final Numbers - Wall-E frontloaded?

The List

Again, I waited till the final numbers were released because the estimates seemed somewhat off.

But, yes, it seems that Wall-E was downright front loaded, especially for an animated film. Ending the weekend with $63.1 million, it had a weekend multiplier of 2.7. To put it in more disturbing perspective, it opened with $3 million more on Friday than The Incredibles and Finding Nemo, yet those two pictures ended the weekend about $7 million ahead (both closed out with a touch over $70 million). Front loading? Less than stellar word of mouth? I don't know. The critics raved, but I have no idea how moviegoers in general will take to this downbeat and arty tone poem. Is it good? Yes, it's visually astonishing, and the ideas, while not totally original, are nourishing and worthwhile (it seems to mix elements of There Will Be Blood, Minority Report, and Idiocracy). I'd place it in the Million Dollar Baby category of great, flawed movies that I will probably never want to watch again.
.
.
MILD SPOILER - To answer the questions that have been buzzing - yes, it's about the environment, yes it's about Wal-Mart, and yes it's about obesity.
.
.

Make no mistake, this is a terrific three-day total for an artistically daring animated feature. Ratatouille did about 4x it's opening weekend by the end of its domestic run. Finding Nemo opened to $70 million and made it all the way to $339 million (4.84x its opening). The low mark is still The Incredibles, which did a 'mere' 3.7x it's $70 million opening (odd, since that is one of their very best pictures and it had one of the smallest second-weekend drops for a $50 million+ opening ever).

Anyway, if Wall-E plays like The Incredibles, it'll end up with $235 million. If it falls below even that to, for example, a mere 3.25x, it'll still end up matching the $204 million of Ratatouille. My own misgivings about its future aside, it'll have to crash and burn pretty hard to qualify as anything other than a solid financial hit. And, frankly, I expect the art house nature and vaguely anti-capitalistic leanings of the picture to be a big boon overseas (every right-wing article or pundit who calls Wall-E 'anti-American' sends another $10 into the overseas ticket coffers).

Onto to movies that deserve to die (tell you why, Ms. Lovett, tell you why...), Wanted turned into a mega-hit whose marketing resonated with several key movie going audiences. Joke's on them, but I digress. Action junkies, date-crowds, nerds, and potentially feminists showed up in force to give Wanted a $50.9 million opening weekend. Shockingly, this had almost as high a multiplier as Wall-E (2.67x). This is easily the biggest R-rated opening ever in June and the seventh biggest R-rated opening ever, just behind 8 Mile's $51.2 million back in November 2002 (you'd have thought that Universal could have found three-hundred grand lying around somewhere). Of course, a shockingly high R-rated opening always begs the question of what PG-13 and under movies benefited from fraudulent ticket purchases? Anyway, I hate the movie, but I suppose the major successes of R-rated movies this summer (Sex & The City, Wanted, The Happening) is a good thing. I'm expecting a HUGE drop for this one, but I'm a tad biased.

In other news, Paramount successfully fudged the Indiana Jones And The Crystal Skull numbers from Sunday's estimates. On Sunday, it was at something like $299.999999999 million, and sure enough the final numbers found enough loose change to allow it to cross the $300 million mark by the end of weekend six and day 39 (tied with Transformers and nine days ahead of Iron Man). Mazel Tov, Henry Jones Jr, mazel-tov.

Get Smart dropped 47% and ended day ten with a solid $77 million. Expect it to cross $100 million over the long holiday and end up a bit below $150 million. At $82 million, this was a solid investment for Warner.

In the 'glass is half full' column, M. Night Shyamalan's The Happening has now doubled its $60 million budget worldwide and will likely turn a tidy profit when all is said and done. In the 'glass half-empty column', of course, it's an allegedly terrible movie that has permanently scarred M. Night Shyamalan's once highly-touted artistic reputation. But, at least it'll make money, right?

In the 'glass is half full' column for The Love Guru... uh, I got nothing. It'll end out at $35 million on a $60 million budget. Good.

Speaking of not-so solid investments... guess what inexplicably acclaimed and far more expensive sequel will possibly fail to surpass the 'underwhelming' domestic box office of its original? If you guessed The Incredible Hulk, you're smarter than Marvel Studios! Dropping another 57%, Hulk not-quite 2 ended weekend three with a mere $116 million. With the never ending supply of Hulk-killers waiting in the wings (Hancock, Hellboy II, The Dark Knight, X-Files 2, Mummy 3, Tropic Thunder, Star Wars: Clone Wars), this bonehead play has at best $20 million left in it (2003's The Hulk had $117 million at this point and would only make another $15 million by the end of its run). So, you have a $160 million sequel to a $130 million movie that grossed $132 million which will be lucky to make $140 million. That's ok Marvel, I'm sure Ant Man will save you.

In the better news department, after hemorrhaging for the first two full weeks after its sensational opening day, Sex & The City finally stabilized with 45%-ish drops and it now has crossed the $140 million mark. Expect it to crawl to $150 million.

Next weekend we have the critically divisive Hancock and the expansion of Kitt Kitridge: An American Girl, which has been going gangbusters in very limited release for the last ten days.

Scott Mendelson

Quantum Of Solace trailer goes online...



Here's a Movie Box link for downloads...

At a glance...

This is a very confident teaser. I have always enjoyed the teasers for the second film in each Bond actor's career. The familiarity and the fearlessness on display. They know Craig works just fine, just as the teaser for Tomorrow Never Dies made it seem like Brosnan was always there.

The film seems in danger of again doing the 'Bond makes it personal and goes off the grid in his quest for vengeance' plot line that was used in License To Kill and sampled in Diamonds Are Forever. Don't ya just love how the cold, vengeance-fueled Bond that everyone hated in Timothy Dalton with License To Kill is now considered hip and cool? For the record, take another gander at The Living Daylights. It's easily the most 'real-world' and complicated James Bond movie ever. Even more than Goldeneye or From Russia With Love, you really have to pay attention in this one.

The action seems far more over the top and stunt packed than Casino Royale. It'll be interesting if Marc Forster can keep a balance with the new, more down-to-earth tone and the potentially super heroic action on display.

To be fair, I'm still annoyed that Martin Campbell wasn't asked back. Martin Campbell made two vastly different 007 films (Goldeneye and Casino Royale), and they are both two of the best non-Connery Bonds ever. The key is keeping the characters grounded and intelligent, and making the action fluid and logical enough to follow and enjoy. Bitter pill that Martin Campbell never got credit for either of his two rejuvenations of this series. In a just world, he would have become the new Terrance Young after Casino Royale.


Last note - how the heck are they going to write a semi-coherent Bond song with the lyrics 'Quantum Of Solace'? I'm betting they cheat, as they did with 'All Time High' in Octopussy, and just ignore the title.

Review: Hancock (2008)

Hancock
2008
95 minutes
rated PG-13

by Scott Mendelson

Hancock is not a perfect film and the third act seems a little rushed (it's no secret that it was cut from 115 minutes to 95 minutes), but this is a real movie, not an assembly-line factory confection. There is strong acting from all parties, including Will Smith, Jason Bateman, and Charlize Theron. In particular, Jason Bateman as Ray takes a character that could have been a stock cardboard cut-out, a sounding board at which the plot unfolds, and he makes him into a sympathetic flesh and blood human being. Ray's attempts to convince corporations to engage in wholesale charity is played for real, and his explanation of how he met his wife is both touching and surprisingly honest. A lesser movie would have used his decency and his desire to do good as a punchline, but this movie takes it very seriously, and its that desire that drives the movie in ways both expected and unexpected.

Will Smith doesn't shy away from making the character not only unlikable, but also desperately sad and confused. He does great deeds and thinks that should be enough, and he doesn't understand why he should have to be polite and humble when he's saving lives (a subtle critique of the current issues that America has with the rest of the world?). But, like Bateman, he has an inherent want to help people and do good, and that drives him to fight crime even when the public hates him for it. For reasons that I won't reveal, Hancock believes that he is deserving of his scorn and thus takes no steps to correct it.

Much has been said of the third-act change. It is not a twist per se, as it's obviously telegraphed from the opening scenes. But it is a progression of story and that may be what is jolting the critics. It is rare in these days for mainstream movies to have stories that gradually unfold throughout all three acts. Usually, 90% of the story is told in the first act and the rest of pay-off. Not Hancock, it has a story, it has a plot, and it's a plot that unfolds over the entire movie. Even in the final scenes, we are still seeing character development and still learning new things about the world that we have been dropped into. The climax contains action, but it is brutal, unglamourous, emotionally compelling action, and the climactic violence is merely a means to allow character choices to be made and relationships to strengthen, weaken, or change. In fact, all of the action scenes are driven by the story and character actions and they all serve important story elements.

How refreshing that Sony chose to withhold this information, to allow moviegoers to actually be surprised for once. The trailers reveal only the first act and bits of the second act, and in that sense the trailers are accurate. The first act is very funny and the second act does some fun things with the idea of a superhero rehabilitating himself (not enough, and I'd wager that stuff was cut from this section). The climax of the second act also has a great dialogue scene with the three leads that is revealing and uncommonly well-written for this genre (this is where Bateman's story of meeting Theron comes in). And even the third-act has an emotional oomph that builds to an absolutely lovely coda just before the credits role.

How distressing that Sony seems to be getting attacked for not revealing the entire film in a three-minute advertisement. It's as if critics are taken aback at actually not knowing where the story was going. God forbid we actually not know every plot point before we see the movie. Sony should be commended for withholding plot points in the marketing. And, apparent tinkering aside, they should be commended for financing this $150 million tentpoler and allowing Peter Berg to make a film that is very much a distinct point of view and actually has a brain. Peter Berg's Hancock is a truly engaging and emotionally compelling character drama that happens to be disguised as a broad superhero satire. It's not a perfect film, and I can't wait to see an extended version, but Hancock is far better than the critical buzz and is a completely compelling motion picture.

Grade: A-

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Batman In The Movies - The narrative arc of Bruce Wayne in the first film series...

The first four Batman pictures are many things to many people. In this essay we will be dealing with the connective tissue of all four films, under the concept that, be it accidental or intentional, there really is a continuity in the four original Batman films, specifically with the character development of Bruce Wayne. It isn't ironclad and the differing creative hands weakens the thru-line, but there is a narrative continuity that indeed exists from Batman to Batman & Robin.

Batman- As a person in Gotham City, Bruce Wayne is merely a non-entity. As we see throughout the picture, he is merely a name, 'that rich guy' that people have heard about but few have actually met. No one recognizes him at his own party in his own house, and Jack Napier doesn't recognize him when he crashes Vicki Vale's apartment. As far as we know, Wayne Enterprises does not exist and his charity work is halfhearted at best. The only evidence of his charity is a donation basket at the Mayoral Ball, which collects money to 'save the 200th anniversary festival'.

Since Bruce Wayne is not a public figure and barely a cipher, his emergence as Batman does not raise any red flags in relation to Bruce Wayne. In the first Batman, Bruce Wayne is barely a shell of a man, not even a disguise but merely a vessel to create and purchase the things that Batman will need to function. For all intents and purposes, Bruce Wayne does not exist. Only Vicki Vale and Alfred Pennyworth make half-hearted efforts to bring Wayne out of his cocoon. Referring to Bruce's obsession with his parents' murders, Alfred bitterly exclaims: "I have no wish to spend my few remaining years mourning the loss of old friends... or their sons."

Forced to choose between loving Vicki Vale as Bruce Wayne and risking losing her as Batman, he chooses Batman. At the end, Batman avenges his parents and establishes himself as a force for good in Gotham City. TRIVIA - In the original Sam Hamm script, reporter Alexander Knox figures out Bruce's secret when Vicki does and confronts him about it. Vicki and Alex are closer friends in this draft and he demands that Wayne make a choice between being Batman or loving Vicki as Bruce Wayne. In the original script, this is rendered moot when Knox is killed in the climactic festival massacre. In this context, Jack Napier's transformation, physically and mentally, into The Joker is an example of a rational man completely giving himself over to a new, more extreme identity (this is a reoccurring theme in the Batman comics, especially with the rogues gallery). Jack Napier is dead, Joker claims, and he is right. Jack Napier has been submerged, permanently, and only The Joker remains.

When The Joker and Bruce Wayne confront each other in Vicki Vale's apartment, Bruce Wayne makes a calculated decision to 'be Bruce Wayne' in a situation where Batman would be more appropriate. In this moment, we see a flash of what Bruce Wayne might be like if Batman completely took over his personality. In essence, we see Batman pretending to be Bruce Wayne. The irony is that it is in this scene that he learns the knowledge that will allow him to avenge his parents and begin the eventual slow slog to contentment and mental stability. Batman's triumph is Bruce Wayne's defeat, as he risks completely destroying the Bruce Wayne persona in his quest for vengeance. At the end of Batman, more so than even at the beginning, Bruce Wayne is a non-entity and there is only Batman.

Batman Returns - With Bruce Wayne's parents avenged and Batman considered a friend to Gotham, Bruce Wayne is pretty much irrelevant. More importantly, Bruce Wayne is forgetting how to be Bruce Wayne in any normal setting. He is awkward in business meetings, has no life as himself, and struggles to be in a relationship as Bruce Wayne. We first see him literally sitting in a chair, staring at a wall, waiting to the Bat Signal to give him a purpose. As the picture unfolds, the three villains who emerge seem to represent various sides of him - the bitter, abandoned orphan (Penguin), the ruthless businessman (Max Shreck), and the reckless vigilante (Catwoman). These are all things that Bruce Wayne could become.

Wayne's initial suspicion comes from Cobblepot's overly forgiving attitude towards parents who literally tossed him into a sewer when he was a baby. Since Wayne probably occasionally harbors feelings that his parents abandoned him, and then the guilt that follows such thoughts, he is suspicious if not jealous of this fellow orphan. Here is a freak of a man, living in the sewers for thirty-three years, and, on the surface, he seems better adjusted than Bruce Wayne. Max Shreck is the ruthless and psychotic businessman that most people probably expect Bruce Wayne to be. If Bruce Wayne is to use his money and power as a means to do business, Shreck is a warning sign to the kinds of moral shortcuts and contempt for fairness that Wayne must avoid.

Catwoman is a wild murderous vigilante who inspires both Bruce Wayne and Batman's interest. Of course, because Bruce Wayne is now an act, and a poor act at that, Bruce Wayne's relationship with Selena Kyle (who is also now playing pretend while out of costume) is doomed. Only as Batman and Catwoman can these two people be themselves and find a connection. While on their first date, Bruce and Selina make awkward small talk, only creating sparks when they drop their acts a little bit (of course, once that happens, the bruises and scars from their other lives interfere). One could argue that Selina only falls for Bruce because he is the first man to be kind to her in a long time, but that is for another day.

In the end, The Penguin (the bitter orphan) is dead , Max Shreck (the corrupt businessman) is dead, and Catwoman (the reckless, murderous vigilante) is presumed dead. These three parts of Bruce Wayne that he fears unleashing have been squashed. Selina has died partially because Bruce was unable to relate to her as Bruce. Due to The Penguin and Catwoman's prior machinations, Batman is viewed with distrust and suspicion and Bruce Wayne is still a complete non-entity.

Batman Forever - In the years since Batman Returns, Bruce Wayne is now a vibrant and important part of Gotham society. Wayne Enterprises is now a major force for business wealth and social good, he is a popular and respected socialite. His morals are beyond compare as is his empathy (faced with the apparent suicide of an underling, he demands full benefits for the man's family, even if the insurance policy won't cover it). He is respected and admired, and he has a measure of success as Bruce Wayne. And, unlike the comic book continuity and the Nolan films, he doesn't have to play a useless idiot in public to deflect suspicion away from his other identity; a stupid storytelling choice that neuters the whole character as a force for good.

Now, however, it is Batman that is struggling. Both of the villains in the picture, The Riddler and Two-Face are concerned solely with killing Batman. In fact, it is Bruce Wayne's abdication of his role as Bruce Wayne that creates The Riddler. Responding to the bat-signal (a false alarm, no less), his swift departure from a meeting with Edward Nygma fuels his mania and sends Nygma over the edge. Ironically, while The Riddler helps Two-Face attempt to humiliate and murder Batman, Edward Nygma concentrates on humiliating and crushing Bruce Wayne. In a film about duality, Edward Nygma seems to do the best job of juggling his two identities.

For much of the film, he struggles with just why he is forcing himself to be Batman, whether he should give that up and just be Bruce Wayne. He has fallen in love with Dr. Chase Meridian, but she seems more interested in Batman. He is almost incompetent as Batman, allowing Two-Face to constantly escape and finding himself unable to track down The Riddler. And after Dick Grayson's parents are murdered by Two-Face (in a bid to lure Batman, no less), Wayne is faced with repressed memories dealing with his own parents. Plus, he sees Dick Grayson going down the same murderous path that once left Bruce Wayne isolated and alone (the original script had direct references to the fact that Batman had shed blood in the first two films). Deciding that he can do more good as Bruce Wayne, and wanting to save Dick Grayson from going down a similar path, he decides to quit being Batman and just be Bruce Wayne. But, in a twist of fate, his enemies have just discovered his secret and invade Wayne Manor. On the very night he resolves to abandon the cape and cowl, an emergency emerges that demands that Batman take action.

Of course, in the end, he rescues both Chase Meridian and Dick Grayson because neither part of his life need dominate the other. By the film's end, he has absolved himself of guilt for his parents' death. Further fleshed out in the original script and deleted scenes on the DVD, Bruce realizes that while he asked his parents to go to the movies the night of their deaths (the source of his guilt), it's not his fault as they ended up seeing the movie that Martha wanted to see. Plus, he has maintained new relationships with both egos. Dick Grayson loses his need for murderous revenge and becomes Robin and Dr. Chase Meridian is willing to try a relationship with Bruce Wayne. Because Bruce Wayne no longer feels guilt over his parents, being Batman is now a choice and thus he can do it purely because he wants to help his city. For the first time as an adult, Bruce Wayne and Batman can co-exist and thus are happy.

Batman & Robin - Bruce Wayne is content. Batman is a beloved force for justice. Wayne has dealt with his parents' death and remains a billionaire socialite and philanthropist. The crime that exists in Gotham is in no way caused by Batman. Both Mr. Freeze and Poison Ivy are created by outside forces and basically exist outside the primary story arc (this is actually one of the problems with the picture, that the villains don't really have a purpose in the story other than to give Batman someone to fight). Batman is beloved by the populace and respective by the police. Bruce Wayne is a respected member of the community. All is well.

In this film, the challenges for Bruce Wayne involve the future. Bruce Wayne struggles with being a father figure to Dick Grayson, even while Alfred, his own father figure, lies at death's door. These are new challenges to Bruce Wayne, but they can be overcome because he is healthy and sane. As the film progresses, Bruce mends fences with Dick Grayson, accepting him not as a son but as a brother and trusted friend. Bruce confesses just how much Alfred has meant to him while Alfred uses his time to contact long-lost family and thank Bruce for allowing him to be part of the good that Batman does (take away everything else from this justifiably ridiculed movie, but the conversations between Bruce and Alfred are genuinely moving and compelling). Alfred is saved from illness, but Bruce knows that when Alfred dies, it will be OK, both because he has accepted that he can't save everyone. At the conclusion of Batman & Robin (and the original series), Bruce Wayne has built a new family, with Dick and Alfred's niece Barbara, that Alfred, Thomas, and Martha would be proud of. The End.

Whatever issues we have may with the much-criticized fourth film, the story being told actually makes a fitting conclusion to the story as it began in Batman back in 1989. We go from Batman overtaking Bruce Wayne, Bruce Wayne struggling to justify his existence, a newly emergent Bruce Wayne struggling to be both Bruce Wayne and Batman, and then a content Bruce Wayne/Batman dealing with the future and starting his own family. The man who had his family ripped from him at a tender age now happily exists as a respected and beloved do-gooder with a new family of his very own.

Scott Mendelson

Friday numbers roll in...

The List
Wall E - Pulls in a terrific $23.3 million on opening day. If this plays like a general audience pleaser (ala Kung Fu Panda), it'll pull in about $71 million, making it the second-biggest non-sequel animated opening (behind The Simpsons which pulled in $74 million last year off a $30 million frontloaded Friday). If it plays like a family picture, it will explode over the Saturday and Sunday matinees and $85 million isn't out of the question.

As far as multipliers go, 3.0x is $70 million, 3.5x is $81 million, and 3.64x is $85 million. For what it's worth, the last two Pixar pictures (Cars and Ratatouille) had 3.0x multipliers while Monsters Inc, Finding Nemo and The Incredibles had 3.5x multipliers. I'm betting that Disney/Pixar will find a way to get to at least $75 million to claim that best-non-sequel cartoon opening. Either way, this is a huge opening day for a very unconventional cartoon (I'll see it today or tomorrow afternoon).
Wanted - I hate this movie, but the critics overall do not. I seem to be playing the contrarian this summer (alas, this means I'll likely love The Happening and dislike The Dark Knight... god forbid). Anyway, this one pulled in a better than expected $18.7 million. I don't know the exact figure, but I know that Angelina Jolie's Tomb Raider (another horrible film) pulled in more than $18 million on June 15th, 2001. That was pretty frontloaded and ended up with $48 million, before collapsing due to terrible word of mouth and ending up with $131 million (a textbook 'quick-kill blockbuster'). Ironically, the 2003 sequel, Cradle Of Life, was much better but since no one liked the original, the sequel made only about $65 million (it was also the rare case where a sequel cost less than the original - $95 million vs $115 million).

So I'm pretty sure this is Jolie's biggest opening day in a live-action film. And since apparently this is playing as a date movie (funny, considering that Jolie is tricking women into thinking they'll enjoy this misogynistic crap, crap where Jolie barely gets to do any action at all after the first act), frontloading shouldn't be too severe, so a $50 million total is not out of the question.

If so, this will be the second $50 million+ opening starring a female in exactly a month. Regardless of my issues with the film, I suppose this is a good thing. Let's see how Kit Kittredge does when it goes wide next weekend, and how Sisterhood of of Tightening... er... Traveling Pants 2 does on August 6th (vulgarity aside, the first one was surprisingly moving and an all-around good movie).

Get Smart drops about 50% to $6.6 million, so it'll likely level out to a decent 45% drop. Look for solid business for the next month as it becomes the safe impulse movie or second-choice.

The Love Guru and The Happening both dropped about 65%. No surprises there. Huge damage is done to the reputations of both M, Night Shyamalan and Mike Myers, although Shyamalan's picture will make a profit in the end (it's overseas total of $60 million has already surpassed the $56 million domestic gross and it will have already doubled its $60 million budget at the global box office as of tomorrow).

More to come tomorrow or Monday, depending on how much news there is.

Scott Mendelson

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Labels