Sunday, May 4, 2008

The new Dark Knight trailer...

You can find this at the official Dark Knight website, as of about two hours ago. If your computer can handle it, just click on the link for a huge, gorgeous streaming version. But, for those with issues with streaming and flash, here's the new trailer for convenience (in much less appealing 'medium size'). For the record, for the completely uninformed about both the plot of this movie and Batman lore, there are at least two huge spoilers hinted at here, so proceed with caution.

Ok, now that you've watched, there are two big things that people are talking about. First off, we appear to see Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal replacing Katie Holmes) being pushed out a window to her death by The Joker. Even if this is her death scene, it'll be the least surprising surprise since Anakin Skywalker turned to the dark side. Everybody and their cousin presumed that Rachel Dawes was being kept around in the sequel for the sole purpose of being murdered by The Joker at about the halfway point. This would be the ideal way to establish The Joker as a hardcore antagonist and to make the inevitable showdown between Batman and Joker as personal as possible. Say what you will about having Joker kill Wayne's parents in Burton's version, but it gave the final confrontation an immediate dose of twenty years of built-up pathos. Still, I'm kinda shocked that they are even hinting at Dawes' fate in the trailer.

Second of all, we see Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) being held face down on the floor while something (gasoline or acid) spills toward him. Later, we see a side profile Dent in a car, gun in hand, with just a hint of something very wrong with the other half of his face. This has caused much discussion on various sites and boards regarding just how Dent gets his face disfigured. Let me be frank on this. It doesn't matter one iota whether it's acid (like the comics), fire (like the 90s cartoon), or an allergic reaction to peanuts. These are the kind of nitty-gritty debates that make film geeks and comic geeks look stupid. If the transformation makes sense in relation to plot and character, then the minor details don't matter.

Nolan, Burton, Schumacher, and the Timm/Dini/Burnett team changed all kinds of little details in their respective Batman films and cartoons, and that's not why they succeeded or failed. Batman: The Animated Series radically altered the origin of Two-Face, both in the manner of his creation and who and what caused it, and that still stands as the best version of the character yet done. Batman Forever had an origin scene literally identical to the comics; right down to the ridiculous scene of Batman sitting in the back of the courtroom and leaping to Dent's defense. Yet that didn't excuse Tommy Lee Jones' over-the-top Looney Tunes miscalculation of a performance. It doesn't matter if Peter Parker has organic web shooters or mechanical ones. It doesn't matter if Wolverine is too tall. It doesn't matter if Kingpin is black. It's all about letting the movie do what it needs to do to work on its own as a movie. Period, end of story.

Scott Mendelson


By a nose...

It's official. Iron Man pulled in $102.1 million over the Thurs-Sun opening weekend. Amusingly enough, Paramount is claiming that the Thursday sneaks only pulled in $3.5 million (down $2 million from earlier reports). This of course, allows Paramount to claim that Iron Man made almost $100 million over the official Fri-Sun opening weekend (final weekend total - $98.6 million).

Astoundingly, the film actually increased its box office on Saturday night, from $35 million to $37 million. I don't recall seeing that happen for an opening of this size since, yep, Spider-Man in 2002. This means word of mouth is likely through-the-roof and we can expect a better than normal hold next weekend (especially, of course, if Speed Racer 'pulls a Poseidon' ). By the way, speaking of astounding, does Iron Man have a prefix in the manner of other Marvel characters? Spider-Man is 'amazing', Hulk is 'incredible' and the X-Men are apparently 'uncanny'. Just curious.

Needless to say, this number surpasses all reasonable expectations. If I still played that Box Office Mojo weekly guess the numbers game, I'd have gotten whupped this weekend; though to be fair my guess of $75 million was right in line with the average guess of $78 million. Mazel tov to all involved. This is a huge start to summer 2008 and is a blessing (big openers bring everyone to the movies in the long run) and a curse (now other event films have heightened expectations). I'll try to have more on how this affects The Dark Knight and The Incredible Hulk later in the week. Expect to see an Iron Man sequel in summer 2010 or 2011, probably starring Faran Tahir as The Mandarin. Nice idea, by the way, defusing obvious Asian racial issues associated with The Mandarin by making him an Afghani (although the name may still be a problem - will later sequels see Iron Man facing off against 'The Jew' or 'The Negro'?).

In other box office news, second place went to Patrick Dempsey's Made Of Honor, which pulled in $15.5 million. Considering the competition and the fact that the film is so second-hand that it was probably financed by Goodwill, this is a pretty solid number. Baby Mama and Forgetting Sarah Marshall both had solid holds (40% and 44% respectively) pushing their respective totals to $$33 million and $45 million. Harold And Kumar got crushed ($6 million - down 60% - total $26 million), both by competition and the fact that their 'escape' isn't half the masterpiece that their 'trip' was (ironically, the film opens with a cheap shot at 2004's Eurotrip, then proceeds to in fact 'suck' harder than Eurotrip).

Scott Mendelson

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Curtain Raisers Versus mid-May monsters - how does Iron Man affect Indiana Jones IV? - a fun trip through box office time.

The next big question is how this effects the rest of the summer films. Let's start with the big one. In three weeks, Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull opens in its effort to win the summer derby. Alas, history may be against it. More often than not, especially in the last several years, the May summer starter has often gone on to surprise and overtake the would-be Mid-May front runner, in terms of prestige, and often in terms of box office. To wit -

In 1996, 1998, 2001, 2000, 2002, and 2003, you had the big summer curtain raiser opening the first weekend in May, and then the alleged top-dog of summer coming out around Memorial Day weekend. In 1996, Twister opened to a then huge $42 million (oh, those were the days...). Two weeks later, Mission: Impossible opened to a then record $75 million over five days (ah, remember when $75 million over five days wasn't disappointing?). Alas, idiots who couldn't follow Mission: Impossible's complicated but coherent plot line (it's called paying attention, nimrods!) soon showered the movie with negative word of mouth, and the film ended up losing to Twister in the box office and audience kudos race ($242 million to $181 million).

Just two years later, Deep Impact opened to $42 million to kick off the summer. Two weeks later, Godzilla opened to an allegedly disappointing $75 million in five days (huh? but, wait a minute...!). Alas, Godzilla chose to open on a Wednesday (with the customary Tuesday sneaks), which is a strategy that should be reserved for movies that are 'GOOD'. Since Godzilla was not 'GOOD' but rather was 'BAD', poisonous word of mouth spread by Friday and the film's three-day number ($44 million) was considered disappointing to most. Remember, just a year earlier The Lost World had shattered every record in the book by pulling in $92 million in four days. And since both involved giant monsters eating people, Godzilla was obviously a sequel to The Lost World and was expected to perform accordingly (some things never change). The audiences' collected dry heave resulted in a pathetic second weekend take of $18 million (it was almost defeated by the Sandra Bullock/Harry Connick Jr romance Hope Floats). In the end, Deep Impact made $141 million on a $75 million budget, while Godzilla made $136 million at a cost of $130 million.

In 2000, Gladiator ended up eclipsing Mission: Impossible 2 in critical and audience acclaim as 'the summer movie of 2000', even while MI2 won a close box office race ($215 million to $183 million). In 2001, The Mummy Returns stunned everyone with a $69 million opening weekend (the second-biggest at the time), riding positive word of mouth to a just over $202 million finish. Alas, the alleged king of summer, Pearl Harbor rode mediocre word of mouth and terrible reviews from a 'disappointing' $75 million four-day take to just under $200 million. If you recall, rival studios swore up and down that this three hour film would do $100 million if four days, then laughed like mad when the media called Pearl Harbor a failure.

Random note - I bet Disney to this day wishes that they had released Pearl Harbor in November or December of 2001. Can you even imagine how much Pearl Harbor would have made riding a wave of post- 9/11 nationalism?

In 2002, Spider-Man shocked everyone by not only breaking every short-term box office record in the book, but completely stealing the thunder from Star Wars Episode II: Attack Of The Clones in all three categories (critical, commercial, and audience approval).

Finally, X2: X-Men United opened summer 2003 with $85 million and became the most popular 'event film' of the summer when Matrix Reloaded confounded audiences two weeks later. Matrix Reloaded made a lot more money ($292 million versus $215 million), but X2 was the popular favorite. Of course, six months later, The Matrix Revolutions violated the above Godzilla rule by opening on a Wednesday. Guess who was able to waltz into a Friday night Matrix Revolutions screening ten minutes before start time and buy a ticket and relax in a perfectly center seat? Whoops.

Will this brand of history repeat itself? Will Iron Man steal the thunder from Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull? It's possible and now Spielberg and Lucas face heightened expectations. In the same way that Attack Of The Clones 'disappointed' with a $110 million four-day opening weekend two weeks after Spider-Man's $114 million three day, will Indy 4 now have to equal or surpass Iron Man's take to be considered initially successful? I hope not, because it may not happen.

Iron Man benefited from three months of middling box office. There hasn't been a true 'event' since Cloverfield back in January. By the time Indiana Jones IV opens (like Star Wars II and III and The Matrix Reloaded, on a Thursday to match with the global release date and combat piracy), it'll have three event films to contend with: Iron Man, Speed Racer, and Prince Caspian. Even Star Wars II only had Spider-Man to worry about at this point.

Having said that, I'll be shocked if Indy 4 doesn't win the marathon against Iron Man, as even under appreciated Spielberg/Lucas event movies have legs that any other film would envy. Heck, even if Indy 4 only sells the same number of tickets as War Of The Worlds ($234 million in 2005), it'll surpass the box office gross of the previous Indiana Jones pictures (Indiana Jones films made, respectively, $242 million, $180 million, and $198 million). Point being, forgive the broken record, don't panic if Indiana Jones 'only' does $90 million over four days. Because there's a good chance it'll do another $50 million over the next weekend (though it sure as hell better top $69 million on its first Friday to Sunday, or risk being humiliated by being beaten by The Mummy Returns).

Still, another sobering footnote for Indiana Jones (last one, I promise). If Indiana Jones is perceived as a less than stellar film, history shows that even if it outgrosses Iron Man, there may well be another film later in the summer that takes the crown from both of them. Independence Day swooped in over July 4th weekend and won 1996's crown ($306 million). Saving Private Ryan beat Godzilla and Deep Impact for summer 1998 ($212 million). Shrek beat Pearl Harbor and Mummy Returns in 2001, and Finding Nemo exploited the general lack of popular movies in summer 2003 (other would-be contenders - Terminator 3, The Hulk, Bad Boys 2, Legally Blonde 2, Charlie's Angels 2) to gross over $330 million to win summer 2003 (the only other popular movie that summer was, of course Pirates Of The Caribbean, which rode word of mouth from a $75 million five day start to a $303 million total). History shows that only three summers (1999, 2000 and 2005) were ruled by the mid-May titans that were expected to be victorious (The Phantom Menace, Mission Impossible 2 and Revenge Of The Sith). Every other summer, the big winner (pre-ordained or not) opened somewhere else on the calender. So, if Indiana Jones And The Crystal Skull is eclipsed by Iron Man and fails to win the summer, and then they both end up losing to The Dark Knight or Hancock, or something none of us see coming, don't be surprised. It's how it usually goes.

Scott Mendelson

And the numbers roll in...

Bad news for Steven Spielberg and George Lucas. Really bad news for Chris Nolan. Good news for Marvel (I knew I should have bought stock, and then sold it before June 13th). By the way, I can't believe Iron Man ended with Tony Stark brutally murdering the Iron Giant. It's really sad... he just didn't want to be a gun anymore.

Iron Man's Friday/Thursday numbers are in and there will be no stupid articles about not measuring up to inflated expectations. Iron Man allegedly pulled in $38 million on Thursday and Friday. That means it pulled in $5.5 million in Thursday night advance showings (starting at 8pm and pretty much running all night on the half hour) and $32.5 million on Friday.

The phrase of the day/weekend is 'biggest -blank- for a non-sequel, second only to the first Spider-Man'. To wit so far - opening day, opening Friday. Likely to take the silver medal - biggest Saturday, biggest Sunday, total opening weekend.

As for what that weekend total will be, numbers this huge make it harder to do the math. Will it be front loaded (most likely, by virtue of pent-up demand)? If so, how much? Will word of mouth be positive (it would seem so, I was only so-so on it and I seem to be in the minority)? Since Spider-Man is the comparison point, let's do the math. Spider-Man did $39 million on it's Friday (it was the rare event movie that didn't cheat with Thursday night or midnight showings). It ended up with $114 million over three days. If it follows the Spider-Man pattern (emphasis on IF), it'll end the weekend with a huge $96 million for the Friday-Sunday portion, and thus close out the weekend just over the $101 million mark (an ungodly victory indeed). If it only behaves like X2: X-Men United, then it closes with a 'mere' $91 million for the 3.5 day weekend. Either way, Vince Vaughn is now very, very jealous.

Congrats to Marvel and Paramount and all involved. This is a terrific win. Obviously, the saturation marketing roped along everyone, even the very women who weren't even officially targeted. I'm dying to hear idiots blabbing about how women went soft for the love story between Pepper Potts and Tony Stark, that they approved of the 'stand by your man' element or whatever such nonsense. Nevermind that there was no hint of romance in the trailers and it's barely in the movie for that matter (one of several underdeveloped threads that should be dealt with in the sequel). Women went for three reasons. They either went because they were dragged along by their boyfriends and husbands, they have prurient interests in Robert Downey Jr, or they went because some of them like shiny toys, manly men, comic book adventure, and explosions as much as boys do (just like they went to see 300 last year because they enjoy handsome, barely clothed muscle men wielding swords and hacking at each other as much as boys do). There will be more tomorrow as the dust settles. God I love summer box office.

Friday, May 2, 2008

One of the funnier videos I've seen in awhile

Found this by accident, not sure who made this. Apparently, it's a series of sketches, so watch the ones on the bottom of the screen too. Enjoy...

Sex And The City gets an R! (R also stands for Really long!)

As I was leaving the theater this afternoon (full Iron Man review coming soon), I glanced at a standee of Sex And The City. By the way, regardless of what Maxim thinks, I can think of many, many people less sexy than Sarah Jessica Parker. I've had a thing for her since LA Story back in 1991 (I was eleven) and I still occasionally do (and I'm sure at least Matthew Broderick and David Letterman would agree).

The ad did confirm that the movie is indeed rated R (for strong sexual content, graphic nudity and language). Hooray for New Line/Warner for not wussing out. There were, if you recall, rumblings about them going for a PG-13 to appease the fans who discovered the show in its edited syndication form, as opposed to the true loyalists who watched the show back in its HBO days. Glad to see they didn't.

I know that this has been discussed elsewhere, but the full trailer does seem to offer a 'Big' hint about the shocking event in the first act. Well, what does it usually mean when a main character is only in the beginning of the trailer and doesn't even appear in the closing montage? Oh well, at least Mike Logan is still alive and kicking (provided Goren doesn't eat him later this season). I'm curious to see if I'm right or not.

I just checked IMDB and the movie is also 140 minutes long! Sweet mother of God! If my wife does succeed in making me come with her for that, then she deserves every one of the 165 minutes that The Dark Knight allegedly runs.

Scott Mendelson

Incredible Hulk trailer promises 'Ultimate Destruction'?

Regardless of the eventually quality of the new Incredible Hulk movie, I was most amused at how many images and action beats in the new trailer seem taken right from the 2005 video game Hulk: Ultimate Destruction. Released on most platforms at the time, it was basically Hulk in a Grand Theft Auto type open environment. And, quite frankly, it's terrific fun and one of the best comic book video games I've ever played. Even the final trailer tag (Hulk using two smashed cars as arm-guards) is taken right from the game, as are the bits involving running up alongside takes, running up and down buildings, and jumping into a helicopter and wrestling it to the ground. Granted, I'm sure Hulk has done these things in the comics before too, but I got a major sense of de je vu while watching the trailer. And truth be told, if the Incredible Hulk movie is 1/3 as much fun to watch as Hulk: Ultimate Destruction is to play, we may all be in for a major surprise in a month.

Scott Mendelson

Thursday, May 1, 2008

The beginning for WB animation on BluRay?

To quote Futurama: Great news everyone! DVDTown has posted that Warner Bros plans to release the first season of Justice League on BluRay on August 19th. Hopefully, this will only be the first release that will eventually see all of the great series in the Bruce Timm created universe (1992-2005) come to BluRay.

Alas, it must be said, the first season of Justice League (2001-2002) was arguably one of the weakest seasons of any such show. Trying to make something markedly less dark and more kid friendly than the previous Batman and Superman shows, they have admitted to overcompensating and creating a relatively flatter and less poignant entertainment than was the norm. Season Two, however, rectified all of these issues and was every bit as good as it should have been.

The current standard-def Justice League episodes look pretty terrific up-converted, so I can only imagine what these will look like. Please, if you're at all a fan of this stuff, buy this so A) we eventually get Batman The Animated Series on BluRay and B) we don't get a redux of Gargoyles, where the third and final box set to complete the series remains unreleased because Disney didn't like the sales numbers for the second boxed set.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Martin Campbell returns...

Good news for rewarding talent...

Martin Campbell, the director who got absolutely no credit for revitalizing James Bond (for the second time) with Casino Royale, has now apparently been attached to two high profile projects:

The first project is an untitled modern day spy vehicle for Tom Cruise. Also involved are Joel Surnow and Michael Loceff, two of the main writer/producers of tv's 24 (hopefully it ends up closer to seasons 1 and 5, as opposed to seasons 2 and 6).

The other project is apparently Mel Gibson's return to acting. Mel Gibson of course, four years of controversies aside, hasn't acted in a mainstream film since Signs, back in 2002. This will be a remake of the 1985 British mini-series Edge Of Darkness (which Campbell helmed back in the day). Also on board is William Monaghan, writer of the remake of The Departed (great dialogue, fun movie, but full of plot holes and illogic) and Kingdom Of Heaven (an underrated masterpiece, whichever version you watch).

Martin Campbell has been one of the very best action directors for the last fifteen years. Goldeneye is still the very best non-Connery Bond film (and Casino Royale is the second), and The Mask Of Zorro is one of the best superhero films ever made. I even enjoyed Campbell's lighter, sloppier sequel (2005's The Legend Of Zorro), which substituted knotty questions of family identity and class for the original's classic hero myth making.

Unlike 90% of action directors, Campbell knows how to shoot wide, cut only when necessary and create a complete sense of geography. And, even in B-level fare like Vertical Limit, the action is character driven and the violence has a sense of sorrow. Oh, and back in 1993, he directed one of the very bests episodes of American television ever, the "Three Men And Adena" episode of Homicide: Life On The Street, so he's got that going for him too. These projects are almost certainly a better use of his talents than his next gig, a remake for Platinum Dunes of The Birds (granted, The Birds is one of Hitch's lesser films, so a remake has interesting possibilities). Either way, it's good to know that he'll be cranking out quality product for the foreseeable future.

Scott Mendelson

Inflated Expectations...

For the record, if a rival executive tells you that someone else's movie is going to break records on its opening weekend, don't believe them. In the same way that politicians inflate the expectations of their rivals in a primary, convention, or general election, studios often use the media to create unrealistic expectations of how someone else's movie will perform.

To wit - anything over $70 million for Iron Man is a huge win, especially as the reviews are positive, so it should have some breathing room before Indy 4 (Speed Racer is a huge question mark and Prince Caspian is chasing a different demo). Anything under $50 million is a disappointment and cause for concern for franchise potential. This is the best slot to open your summer movie - period. Even with bad reviews and bad pre-release buzz, Universal's Van Helsing still pulled in $52 million in this slot back in 2004.

But Marvel comic book movies are not sequels to each other. In the same way that Madagascar was not a sequel to Shrek 2 (if you recall, analysts went crazy because Madagascar opening on Memorial Day Weekend 2005 to 'only $65 million in four days', 'less than half of Shrek 2's opening five day figure!!'), Iron Man is not Spider-Man 4. Anyone who is expecting Iron Man do to over $100 million is either lying or overly optimistic.

Could it do such a number? Of course, it COULD. Despite the 'no girls allowed' nature of the marketing, Downey Jr is the ultimate 'rebel in need of saving' for many women. And, of course, you need both sexes to do anything over $40 million. If the Downey factor is enough to draw in willing females (as opposed to begrudging girlfriends and women who like big metal toys as much as boys), then X2 numbers are not out of question ($85 million on this same weekend in 2003).

For the record, I'm not one who believes that Grand Theft Auto IV is going to make a major dent in the numbers. The game came out yesterday and gamers have to take a break sometime this weekend. Besides, what about the much anticipated release of Mario Kart Wii? Or will that be the alleged cause if Speed Racer under performs next week? But, it could make a small impact, perhaps the difference between doing $75 million and $85 million. There are plenty of adults who bought the game yesterday but will be too busy with jobs and family to play it before the weekend.

Point being, as the summer begins, let us try to keep perspective and be realistic about what movies will open to how much. $100 million+ would be an ungodly triumph for Paramount/Marvel, but don't believe the Monday-morning quarterbacks who snicker at $65 million.

Scott Mendelson

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Labels