Thursday, November 3, 2011

Why Denzel Washington is the last old-fashioned movie star...

It is no secret that I often whine about the lack of mid-budget, star-driven, adult-skewing thrillers in this fantasy-tent pole era.  And while there has certainly been a slight resurgence in the form over the last year, it still remains a fact that most of the stars of today and yesterday (or their respective agents) would rather hitch their tent to an established franchise rather than try their hand at the star vehicle.  In a time when Tom  Hanks tried (needlessly I'd argue) to cling to relevancy by stepping into the Dan Brown universe and where even Will Smith was so traumatized by the 'failure' of Seven Pounds that he went speeding back to Men in Black (and may end up doing another Independence Day), Denzel Washington is arguably the last of a dying breed.  He is a true movie star in the purest sense of the term and a reminder of the kind of movies, like Safe House (trailer) that were once made by such stars when the term had any real value.

He is arguably among the most reliable box office draws in the business.  And he has made his career and his fortune by putting his name and his neck out their time and time again.  He has never made a superhero film or fantasy tent pole.  He has never starred in a sequel.  He has made a couple remakes, but both  The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 and The Manchurian Candidate were pretty darn good thrillers.  Point being, Denzel Washington makes explicitly old-fashioned movies.  He makes sentimental, often true life melodramas (Remember the TitansJohn Q), historical dramas (Malcolm XThe HurricaneAmerican Gangster), politically-topical action pictures (The Siege, Inside ManUnstoppable) and white-knuckle thrillers (Training DayOut of TimeMan On Fire, etc).  Pretty much every Denzel Washington star vehicle is just that: an original genre picture that features a solid supporting cast and a narrative set squarely on Earth.  The closest he's come to out-and-out fantasy, The Book of Eli and Deja Vu, are still character-driven action dramas that don't overdose on special effects or fantasy elements at the expense of the narrative.

His films aren't always good (I'm not a fan of American Gangster or John Q) and they aren't always box office smashes (neither of the two films he directed, Antoine Fisher or The Great Debaters, were financially successful), but they provide the kind of old-fashioned movie-making that is in sadly short supply in this day-and-age.  What separates Denzel Washington from the pack of alleged next generation of stars is that he can actually open a movie to $20 million or more all by himself.  What separates him from the stars of his generation is that he is still making the kind of movies that made him a sensation in the 1990s.  Perhaps one of the reasons that Denzel Washington has maintained his star power for the last 20 years is that he still goes out of his way to make 'the kind of movies they just don't make anymore'.

Scott Mendelson                

1 comment:

  1. The Siege... that film takes me back. I saw it when came out in 1998. Ed Zwick did a great job and the cast was great (Even Bruce Willis!). The movie flopped in the U.S. and did OK overseas. Almost three year later, 9/11 happened. What was one of the first things I thought about? The Siege. That movie was kind of prophetic, not just of the attacks but of the government reaction. I rented it from the video store weeks after (I live overseas) and the impact was even stronger.

    ReplyDelete